3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
13 / 3
Mentions
0000 M e to Bobbi We are good. al ' 12/21/202010:1S AM ss Hi all. Sorry to pile on. but we represented to Judge Nathan in a filing last week that Maxwell would continue to receive legal calls every weekday and that MDC planned to convert those calls to VTCs during lockdown. Would one of you be able to
mithmac.coms Hoge: Good afternoon- I am counsel for GHISLAINE MAXWELL 02879-509 I have requested but have never received video calls with my client Ghislaine Maxwell. Ms. Papapcim and Mr. Wallace informed the Court that Ms. Maxwell was provided one video call, which I confirmed occurred on August 18th but failed
From Subject Re: FW: URGENT REQUEST FOR VTCs-GHISLAINE MAXWELL 02879.509 Date: Mon, 21 Dec 202015:18:15
n. Following up on this morning's conversation. Ms. Maxwell is requesting daily legal VTCs from l2:30 - 3:30
r New York. NY 1001 1 EFTA00100284 On Dec 9, 2020. at 2:24 PM, BOBBI C STERNHEIM clicslernheimithmac.coms Hoge: Good afternoon- I am counsel for GHISLAINE MAXWELL 02879-509 I have requested but have never received video calls with my client Ghislaine Maxwell. Ms. Papapcim and Mr. Wallace informed the Court that Ms.
e this message. Thank you. On Dec 16, 2020, at 2:47 PM, BOBBI C STERNHEIM clacuraltimffemac.mm> Went: Understood. Many thanks! Best- Bobbi ROBB! C. STERNHEIM, ESQ. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 ••Covid-I9 Native: The West l9th Street office iscurren
NY 10007 Dear Judge Nathan: 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, New York 10011 [email protected] December 7, 2020 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) As counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, we write in response to the letter from MDC staff attorneys. (See Dkt. 8k) The letter fails to
it for the Court's consideration. (See Exhibit A.) We renew our request that Warden respond directly to the Court and counsel and explain why Ms. Maxwell must be detained under such harsh and restrictive conditions. Using the term "[lin her current assignment," the letter attempts to present a pictur
lmlow.com December 7, 2020 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) As counsel for Ghislai
irectly to the Court and counsel and explain why Ms. Maxwell must be detained under such harsh and restrictiv
en after his death. I believe very strongly in that case," Barr told ABC News on Wednesday. . . . "And as 2 EFTA00040348 LAW OFFICES OF 13O13131 C. STERNHEIM you will recall, after he committed suicide, I said that I was confident that we would continue to pursue this case vigorously and pursue anyone wh
No. 21-770 & 21-58 In the ZiRita) *tates Court of Apprat5 for the *mufti Circuit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Appellant. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 20-CR-330 (AJN) Appellant Ghislaine Ma
. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Appellant. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 20-CR-330 (AJN) Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's Appendix to the Renewed Motion for Pretrial Release Leah S. Saffian LAW OFFICES OF LEAH SAFFIAN 15546 Meadowgate Road Encino, California 91436-3
t Order April 27, 2021 EFTA00089468 CaseQa20-20-6191WilfslerDifituraetit7221321FiNB04/a/Eligftget of 4 21.58-cr (L), 21.770-cr United States v. Maxwell United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the
A. We press our concerns regarding disruption of Ms. Maxwell's sleep and the deleterious effect sleep depriva
ocence at her trial in the United States. 2 EFTA00089483 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 272 Filed 05/07/21 Page 3 of 3 LAW OFFICES OF 13O13131 C. STERNHEIM In the face of the Epstein's death on the GOP's watch, the MDC would not risk a repeat of the debacle that occurred in the MCC. There can be no dou
Entities connected to both Ghislaine Maxwell and C. STERNHEIM