Epstein Secrets

411)(2). In connection with her motion, Plaintiff filed' proposed order of dismissal imposing certain conditions (the "Proposed Order"). Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell opposed the motion. For the following reasons, subject to Plaintiff's consent, dismissal is granted pursuant to the terms of the Proposed Order modi

nt to the terms of the Proposed Order modified as described below. I. BACKGROUND On November 12, 2019, Plaintiff filed I Complaint against Ms. Maxwell and Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their official capacities as appointed executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "E

ain conditions (the "Proposed Order"). Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell opposed the motion. For the following rea

12, 2019, Plaintiff filed I Complaint against Ms. Maxwell and Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. K

ntiff, 19 Civ. 10475 (LGS) -against- DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as executor : of the Estate ofJeffkey Edward Epstein, et al., Defendants. LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: X OPINION AND ORDER On January 21, 2021, Plaintiff filed I motion to dismiss this action with prejudice, pursuant to Federal R

rict Judge: WHEREAS, on March 9, 2021, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed a notice of taxation of costs (Dkt

. It is hereby ORDERED, that Plaintiff shall pay Ms. Maxwell $102.19 in costs. The Clerk of Court is respectf

475 (LGS) -against- ORDER DARREN K. INDYKE, et al., Defendants. : X LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, on March 9, 2021, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed a notice of taxation of costs (Dkt. No. 122) and proposed Form AO 133 Bill of Costs seeking taxation of costs totaling $102.19 (Dkt. No. 122-

filed a letter stating that "she does not object to paying the $102.19 of costs." Dkt. No. 123. It is hereby ORDERED, that Plaintiff shall pay Ms. Maxwell $102.19 in costs. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to tax costs in the amount of $102.19 and execute the proposed Bill of Costs at Docke

DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, 19 Civ. 10475 (LGS) -against- ORDER DARREN K. INDYKE, et al., Defendants. : X LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, on March 9, 2021, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed a notice of taxation of costs (Dkt. No. 122) and proposed Form AO 133

1(a)(2). In connection with her motion, Plaintiff filed a proposed order of dismissal imposing certain conditions (the "Proposed Order"). Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell opposed the motion. For the following reasons, subject to Plaintiff's consent, dismissal is granted pursuant to the terms of the Proposed Order modi

suant to the terms of the Proposed Order modified as described below. I. BACKGROUND On November 12, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Ms. Maxwell and Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their official capacities as appointed executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "E

ain conditions (the "Proposed Order"). Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell opposed the motion. For the following rea

ber 12, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Ms. Maxwell and Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. K

tiff, 19 Civ. 10475 (LGS) -against- DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as executor : of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein, et al., Defendants. LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: X OPINION AND ORDER On January 21, 2021, Plaintiff iled a motion to dismiss this action with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Ru