3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
11 / 3
Mentions
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 11/22/21 20-CR-330 (MN) MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN,
Page: EFTA00014701 →TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTR
Page: EFTA00014701 →rt addressed the admissibility of Dr. Ryan Hall in a separate written opinion. In this opinion, the Court addresses the preliminary admissibility of Bennett Gershman based on the parties' current proffers. I. Legal standard Federal Rule of Evidence 702 governs the admissibility of expert testimony. That rule
Page: EFTA00014701 →ed, and the fact that the defendant was not initially a target of the 4 EFTA00014704 --- PAGE BREAK --- investigation are all irrelevant" to Ms. Maxwell's guilt. Id. at 19 (quoting United States v. Duncan, No. 18-CR-289, 2019 WL 2210663 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)). The Court concludes that the expected topics
Page: EFTA00014705 →E BREAK --- investigation are all irrelevant" to Ms. Maxwell's guilt. Id. at 19 (quoting United States v. Dun
Page: EFTA00014705 →UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 11/22/21 20-CR-330 (MN) MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN,
gative techniques used, and the fact that the defendant was not initially a target of the 4 EFTA00087223 investigation are all irrelevant" to Ms. Maxwell's guilt. Id. at 19 (quoting United States v. Duncan, No. 18-CR-289, 2019 WL 2210663 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)). The Court concludes that the expected topics
TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTR
TA00087223 investigation are all irrelevant" to Ms. Maxwell's guilt. Id. at 19 (quoting United States v. Dun
rt addressed the admissibility of Dr. Ryan Hall in a separate written opinion. In this opinion, the Court addresses the preliminary admissibility of Bennett Gershman based on the parties' current proffers. I. Legal standard Federal Rule of Evidence 702 governs the admissibility of expert testimony. That rule
ited States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The parties respectfully submit this joint letter to provide the Court with a list of names, places, and rele
, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The partie
New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Th
esselsen • • • • Michael Buscemi EFTA00040231 Page 2 • • Tracy Chappell • • Dr. Park Dietz • Eva Anderson Dubin • Glen Dubin • • Bennett Gershman • Lesley Groff • Dr. Ryan Hall • • • • Jordana Feldman • • Stephen Flatley • • Robert Hanson • • • Paul Kane • Robert Kelso •
Entities connected to both Ghislaine Maxwell and Bennett Gershman

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATION
Paul Ryan
PERSON
Russell Simmons
PERSON
Valle
PERSONLoftus
PERSONDietz
PERSON
Germany
LOCATIONDaubert
PERSON
Ryan Hall
PERSONUlbricht
PERSONElizabeth Loftus
PERSONLisa Rocchio
PERSONPark Dietz
PERSONCollector's Coffee Inc.
ORGANIZATION