Epstein Secrets

her guests. approximately three year ago she met Ghislaine Maxwe Epstein through a mutuiiiiiiend. Epstein a

vestigation and I felt she may hav information pertaining to the case. During a sworn taped statement, stated she met Epstein three years ago when Ghaline Maxwell approached her while she was attending Palm Beach Atlantic College to work around Epstein's house. Maxwell had told her that they needed irls to w

et Epstein three years ago when Ghaline Maxwell approached her while she was attending Palm Beach Atlantic College to work around Epstein's house. Maxwell had told her that they needed irls to work at the house to answer phones and run errands. accepted the job Si an working at Epstein's house on El

ee Doe #1 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80069-KAM, DE 9. Two weeks later (March 6, 2008), having changed lawyers, Jane Doe #1 refiled her complaint in Florida Circuit Court as the instant case, adding two nominal defendants: Mr. Epstein's personal secretary, and , one of Jane Doe #1's contemporaries. These defendants

ree years. Epstein has paid to erform Swedish Massages (Deep Tissue) on him and other guests. explained that approximately three year ago she met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein through a mutual friend. Epstein and Maxwell were looking for a massage therapist. stated since that time, she is notified wh

m and other guests. explained that approximately three year ago she met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein through a mutual friend. Epstein and Maxwell were looking for a massage therapist. stated since that time, she is notified when Epstein is coming to Palm Beach. stated she comes to his hous

lained that approximately three year ago she met Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein through a mutual fri

e Doe #1 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80069-KAM, DE 9. Two weeks later (March 6, 2008), having changed lawyers, Jane Doe #1 refilled her complaint in Florida Circuit Court as the instant case, adding two nominal defendants: Mr. Epstein's personal secretary, and one of Jane Doe #1's contemporaries. These defendants ha

s to maybe cross the line a little too closely (Fisten Aff. ¶ 8); • Telling Fisten that Epstein said he was very upset that Edwards had subpoenaed Ghisline Maxwell, referring to her as a good person that did nothing wrong (i.e., had done nothing wrong even though she helped procure young girls to satisfy Epstei

very upset that Edwards had subpoenaed Ghisline Maxwell, referring to her as a good person that did nothi

6-1CAM (S. D. Fla. 2009) Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc., 9 15 fn. 2 945 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2006) 15 E.W. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028XXXMBAB (Florida Circuit Court) 4 Gonzales v. Nat? Broad Co., Inc., 194 F.3d 29 (2d Cir. 1999) 7 In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 (2s Cir. 1973) 12 In re Steinhardt Partners, L