Epstein Secrets

80 Oct 3 Deposit U85 BANK USA DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 161 56 Oct 17 Deposit UBS BANK USA DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 1300.00 41220.70 continued next page SDNY GM 00021097 OW70003005748009 NP7000193796 00003 1014 030575004 CONFIDENTIAL 000000 ►age 31 of 98 EFTA_00 1 3 17 17 EFTA01273924 4tUBS UBS Strat

trived pate Money balance ec0vities (continued) Oct 27 Withdrawal UBS BANK USA DEPOSIT ACCOUNT ASOF 10124114 -1220.78 Activity Account name: GHISLAINE MAXWELL Friendly account name: Account number: Your II nuncio' Advisor: SCOTT STACK MANY LYLE CASRIEL Desuption Amount (5) Oct31 Closing UBS

cial Services Inc. 299 Park Avenue 25th Floor New York NY 10171.0002 UBS Strategic Advisor November 2014 CM-70056752 59 1111 Y2 YI 0 GHISI ANF MAXWELL Account name: GHIStANE MAXWELL Friendly account name: Account number Your financial Advisor. SC077 STACKMAAULYLE CASRIEL Phone Questions about

ASOF 10124114 -1220.78 Activity Account name: GHISLAINE MAXWELL Friendly account name: Account number: Your II

Park Avenue 25th Floor New York NY 10171.0002 UBS Strategic Advisor November 2014 CM-70056752 59 1111 Y2 YI 0 GHISI ANF MAXWELL Account name: GHIStANE MAXWELL Friendly account name: Account number Your financial Advisor. SC077 STACKMAAULYLE CASRIEL Phone Questions about your statemeat? Call your Fina

yes rites under the Wanes Mew Protean Act (SPA) • el the hewn nekton on the top eh ce the Inn of the laimml it not ICS FitIntolSeonark 185 natal Stinson) yea avant as nine broker by d ralgernent *nth the ante oaten We Jawed you on thrsrentionthp nhen you opened his excite In this cat, we keds and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) 11ENIORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF II E:R OB JECTIONS TO THE PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION RE

ESSER LLP Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00156337 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. The 2003 Guidelines Apply to the Offense Conduct 1 A. A Jury Must Determine the End Date of Criminal

the More Onerous 2004 Guidelines Based Solely on Epstein's Conduct 8 II. The Five-Point Adjustment Under USSG § 4B1.5 Does Not Apply 10 A. Ms. Maxwell Does Not Present a Continuing Danger to the Public. 11 B. Applying § 4BI.5 Would Lead to Absurd Results. 14 III. Ms. Maxwell Does Not Qualif

stment Under USSG § 4B1.5 Does Not Apply 10 A. Ms. Maxwell Does Not Present a Continuing Danger to the Publi

kely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004) 4 Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007) 15 Peugh v. United States, 569 U.S. 530 (2013) 1, 4 Stinson v. United States, 508 U.S. 36 (1993) 14 United States v. Bennett, 37 F.3d 687 (1st Cir. 1994) 8 United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005)

1(a)(2). In connection with her motion, Plaintiff filed a proposed order of dismissal imposing certain conditions (the "Proposed Order"). Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell opposed the motion. For the following reasons, subject to Plaintiff's consent, dismissal is granted pursuant to the terms of the Proposed Order modi

suant to the terms of the Proposed Order modified as described below. I. BACKGROUND On November 12, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Ms. Maxwell and Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their official capacities as appointed executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "E

ain conditions (the "Proposed Order"). Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell opposed the motion. For the following rea

ber 12, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Ms. Maxwell and Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. K

A district court may exercise its "sound discretion" in deciding a Rule 41(a)(2) motion. Catanzano v. Wing, 277 F.3d 99, 109 (2d Cir. 2001); accord Stinson v. City Univ. of New York, No. 18 Civ. 5963, 2020 WL 2133368, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. May 4, 2020). Although "[v]oluntary dismissal without prejudice is .

al Separation Minimum — (RVSM) SDNY_GM_02754995 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA 00241917 EFTA01327035 SDNY GM 02754996 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_0024 19 I 8 EFTA01327036 EFTA01327037 SDNY GM 02754998 SUBJECT T

U. S. Garaged Mechanic rasnasons, Ado.. 300110•00.1000 Foreign canelcated Mechanic _j C. Certificate No. oar CUEVEI/J0 Ss OH Centres:4 now Stinson CRS# WC7R346J 2* 411411 ow" WNW STATES Z C•finteled Mantionanca Oryanizaton II I codify Met the repair andlet eleretton made to In unigs hav

411)(2). In connection with her motion, Plaintiff filed' proposed order of dismissal imposing certain conditions (the "Proposed Order"). Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell opposed the motion. For the following reasons, subject to Plaintiff's consent, dismissal is granted pursuant to the terms of the Proposed Order modi

nt to the terms of the Proposed Order modified as described below. I. BACKGROUND On November 12, 2019, Plaintiff filed I Complaint against Ms. Maxwell and Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their official capacities as appointed executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "E

ain conditions (the "Proposed Order"). Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell opposed the motion. For the following rea

12, 2019, Plaintiff filed I Complaint against Ms. Maxwell and Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. K

). I district court may exercise its "sound discretion" in deciding' Rule 411(2) motion. Catanzano v. Wing, 277 F.3d 99, 109 (2d Cir. 2001); accord Stinson v. City Univ. of New York, No. 18 Civ. 5963, 2020 WL 2133368, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. May 4, 2020). Although "[v]oluntary dismissal without prejudice is ..