Epstein Secrets

9 2.30 Gad 104 940.70 93910 Plamm (0/1 1203.00 1191.00 Uses Da/ 14.12 14.00 %CIL .1.98 -018 4.27 •101 4.88 AMMATtill ONE Pd. %OS GM OM 0.82 OJAI .063 COM It) 1.17 1.18 0.68 Cam 101 384 3.82 4346 Como (b) 0.53 0.53 0.91 UMW 0.000 td It) 202110 198.00 .142 mer Ar

a long time since Lynn has been gone," said her mother. BeverlyJu- lin. Fn. of Sebastian. "We've all mourned her, and I'm just glad it is Over," Julio said her (laugh- ter had five brothers and one sister and the news of Tessierh plea will help them all find closure. According to the state atto

760-6t3.1814 mu 117439801 TN. 1st it or a matt was riot tis kW calls ant is dmeitlat of* de mot esatibol INN ass Ho ben plot Not tat rd rear by GM Is it! (Sir coda 10X ashes- WM Na tett byte trana or MOODS RIO minicest Gem kite ttorstoy a/ die tam of tte t14172" Slake nt• /aging attelld ra

Fitts Mae I New York. NF 10036-4,94 1: 112-121•58S0 I F: 212.575.3095 Cabbed $355 Armada One I Crated. CA We • 7: 030•9334500 I F: 780-603.1814 Julio' 78087802 Du Pinta Magma! takabCOOtIronsal TAR bate wi n$ - to chneterelta d te mod deserted *tin atter A Oa been wait ms• • maned and Strad W C

S DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. REPLY MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL pi SUPPORT OF HER THIRD MOTION FOR RAII Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemhcim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York NY 10011 P

th Avenue Denver CO 80203 Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00031918 --- PAGE BREAK --- Preli

The issue before the Court, as it has been since Ms. Maxwell's first bail application, is whether conditions

one: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00031918 --- PAGE BREAK --- Preliminary Statement The issue before the Court, as it has been since Ms. Maxwell's first bail application, is whether conditions exist that can reasonably assure Ms. Maxwell's appearance at trial. On her third application (the "

amples of French courts deporting individuals who have lost French nationality following the commission of an offense. (Id. ¶ 21). Accordingly, Mr. Julio concludes: "[I]t cannot have been the intention of French lawmakers that Article 696-4 be construed as meaning that a person who has lost French na