Epstein Secrets

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 value of taking the depositions of Trump, Dershowitz, former President Clinton, David Copperfield, Leslie Wexner as an inducement to get Mr. Epstein to settle his lawsuits?" Again, Mr. Scarola objects. Judge, this all continues on the next page. The question

mer President Clinton, David Copperfield, Leslie Wexner as an inducement to get Mr. Epstein to settle hi

urt turns to page 16, there's actually a statement of government privilege in response to a question: "Did you ever have any contact with Kendall Coffey regarding the propriety or asking him an opinion on the propriety of taking that book from Mr. Rodriguez?" "Same objections. Work product and att

t him as well. So those are the two individuals that Your Honor requested some background information about. That's the background information. Kendall Coffey Kendall Coffey was an individual outside the Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler firm who was considered to be an ethics expert, who was consulted about

president Clinton, David Copperfield, and Leslie Wexner as an inducement to get Mr. Epstein to settle hi

th Mr. Rothstein or anyone on his behalf the value of taking the depositions of Trump, Dershowitz, former president Clinton, David Copperfield, and Leslie Wexner as an inducement to get Mr. Epstein to settle his lawsuits? Transcript of Deposition dated March 23, 2010, page 284; line 18-23. MR. SCAROLA: Beyo

at page 91-92; line 25-1. MR. KING: The same objection, all based on work product. Id. at page 92; line 2- 3. Q: Did you ever have any contact with Kendall Coffey regarding the propriety or ask him for an opinion of the propriety of taking that book from Mr. Rodriguez? Id. at page 95; line 1-4. MR. KING: The

tacted Leslie Wexner? 6 A. The first answer was 11:24:07 7 lawyer. 8 I then subsequently learned that among 11:24:11 9 those who contacted Leslie Wexner's lawyers was 10 David Boies and Sigrid McCawley. 11 Q. Not Bradley Edwards, correct? 11:24:24 12 MR. SCOTT: Objection as to the form. 11:24:2

21 16 very -- I wasn't sure, so I called Leslie Wexner. I 17 got his wife on the phone, Abigail Wexner

and paralegals. I've been represented by Kenneth 12 Sweder and presumably some of his partners and 13 associates. 14 I've been represented by Kendall Coffey 09:56:15 15 and several of his associates and partners. I would 16 say those are my main lawyers. But I've also had 17 others. 18 I have sou

on Kikka Claudio FW: Out of state subpoenas Joint W/P Priv. 10264-10266 08/09/2009 Adam Horowitz Jacquie Johnson RE:Epstein-Letter regarding Leslie Wexner Joint W/P Priv. 1 EFTA00602835 Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe. Weissing, Edwards. Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRI

radley Edwards RE:Motion for protective order/discussion Joint W/P Priv. 11430-11434 08/27/2009 Spencer Kuvin Bradley Edwards Discussion RE:Wexner involvement Joint W/P Priv. 11443 09/17/2009 Katherine Ezell Bradley Edwards Wexner served subpoena OH Joint W/P Priv. 11541-11542 09/29/200

; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03575-03588 10/19/2009 Kendall Coffey Bradley Edwards Providing New Witnesses W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of ad

iscovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 11105-11110 09/09/2009 Jacquie Johnson Bradley Edwards Disseminate letter from Wexner attorney Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence

ed to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 11568 10/07/2009 Paul Cassell Bradley Edwards Meeting with Leslie Wexner Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03575-03588 10/19/2009 Kendall Coffey Bradley Edwards Providing New Witnesses W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of ad

th Mr. Rothstein or anyone on his behalf the value of taking the depositions of Trump, Dershowitz, former president Clinton, David Copperfield, and Leslie Wexner as an inducement to get Mr. Epstein to settle his lawsuits? Transcript of Deposition dated March 23, 2010, page 284; line 18-23. MR. SCAROLA: Beyo

president Clinton, David Copperfield, and Leslie Wexner as an inducement to get Mr. Epstein to settle hi

at page 91-92; line 25-1. MR. KING: The same objection, all based on work product. Id. at page 92; line 2- 3. Q: Did you ever have any contact with Kendall Coffey regarding the propriety or ask him for an opinion of the propriety of taking that book from Mr. Rodriguez? Id. at page 95; line 1-4. MR. KING: The