Epstein Secrets

oceed. The Court should uphold BOP's logical and plausible reliance on Exemption 7(A). BOP's reliance on Exemptions 6 and 7(C) to protect images of Epstein's body and the names of his associates was also proper. Epstein's surviving family member retains a privacy interest in the details of Epstein's su

s the privacy interest of Epstein's brother in not having details and images of his brother's corpse publicly released. This position is contrary to Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004), and lower court decisions that expressly recognize surviving family members' interests in avoiding t

oceed. The Court should uphold BOP's logical and plausible reliance on Exemption 7(A). BOP's reliance on Exemptions 6 and 7(C) to protect images of Epstein's body and the names of his associates was also proper. Epstein's surviving family member retains a privacy interest in the details of Epstein's su

s the privacy interest of Epstein's brother in not having details and images of his brother's corpse publicly released. This position is contrary to Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004), and lower court decisions that expressly recognize surviving family members' interests in avoiding t

oceed. The Court should uphold BOP's logical and plausible reliance on Exemption 7(A). BOP's reliance on Exemptions 6 and 7(C) to protect images of Epstein's body and the names of his associates was also proper. Epstein's surviving family member retains a privacy interest in the details of Epstein's su

s the privacy interest of Epstein's brother in not having details and images of his brother's corpse publicly released. This position is contrary to Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004), and lower court decisions that expressly recognize surviving family members' interests in avoiding t