Epstein Secrets

n confided in him. saying. for example. that he had left Bear Stearns in 1981 after he was discovered ex- ecuting "illegal operations." Several of Epsteiris bear Stearns contem- poraries recall that Epstein left the compa- ny very• suddenly. Within the company there were rumors also that he was involved

ho declined comment. Epstein is the president of J Epstein & Co., a money management company based in Manh

, Larry Visoski Flight Engineer: Larry Morrison DATE; - eJ , 2005 FROM r F K TO e /3 I 2. Departure AM rime : 2y PASSENGERS 1. Jeffrey Epstein G. A 1..c 3. 7),9•1,/dab 4. 4/04 11'1 .lam fr./ ozg 5, itiA, de, %. c ). 4 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12- 13. 14.

owned by Wexner's even more mysterious protégé, Jeffrey E. Epstein. Epstein, who recently loaned his jet t

ult. They decided to use the press to embarrass Mr. Epstein." But records show that Reiter wrote Krischer o

C. PASSENGER MANIFEST Registration Number- N908.JE Type: B-727-31 Pilots: Dave Rodgers, Larry Wr

owned by Wexner's even more mysterious protégé, Jeffrey E. Epstein. Epstein, who recently loaned his jet to

rofessor, University of Paris Michael 3 Critelli, Chairman, Pitney Bowes, Inc., Stamford Lester Crystal, NBC/RCA Gerald L. Curtis, Prof. Poli Sci, Columbia Univ. Kenneth Dam, U.S. Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Lynn E. Davis,VP, Dir., Rand Corp., Former U.S. Under Sec. for International Security Affairs

Genola, Managing Director, IFI and IFIL Richard N. Gardner, Of Counsel, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP; former U.S. Ambassador to Spain and to Italy; Columbia Univ. Lord Garel-Jones, advisor to UBS Warburg, London; Member of the House of Lords Leslie H. Geib, President, Council on Foreign Relations John A. G

oceed. The Court should uphold BOP's logical and plausible reliance on Exemption 7(A). BOP's reliance on Exemptions 6 and 7(C) to protect images of Epstein's body and the names of his associates was also proper. Epstein's surviving family member retains a privacy interest in the details of Epstein's su

Dep't of Commerce, 337 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 Kimberlin v. DOJ, 139 F.3d 944 (D.C. Cir. 1998) 13 Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia Univ. v. U. S. Dep't of Homeland Security, 407 F. Supp. 3d 334 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 19 Kubik v. U.S. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 10-6078-TC, 2011 WL 26195

oceed. The Court should uphold BOP's logical and plausible reliance on Exemption 7(A). BOP's reliance on Exemptions 6 and 7(C) to protect images of Epstein's body and the names of his associates was also proper. Epstein's surviving family member retains a privacy interest in the details of Epstein's su

Dep't of Commerce, 337 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 Kimberlin v. DOJ, 139 F.3d 944 (D.C. Cir. 1998) 13 Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia Univ. v. U. S. Dep't of Homeland Security, 407 F. Supp. 3d 334 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 19 Kubik v. U.S. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 10-6078-TC, 2011 WL 26195

oceed. The Court should uphold BOP's logical and plausible reliance on Exemption 7(A). BOP's reliance on Exemptions 6 and 7(C) to protect images of Epstein's body and the names of his associates was also proper. Epstein's surviving family member retains a privacy interest in the details of Epstein's su

Dep't of Commerce, 337 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 Kimberlin v. DOJ, 139 F.3d 944 (D.C. Cir. 1998) 13 Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia Univ. v. U. S. Dep't of Homeland Security, 407 F. Supp. 3d 334 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 19 Kubik v. U.S. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 10-6078-TC, 2011 WL 26195