7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
8 / 7
Mentions
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 9:30 AM To: Peter Attia Subject: Re: Jim S yes, and he derserves it On Sun, Sep 20, 20
0 AM To: Peter Attia Subject: Re: Jim S yes, and he derserves it On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 12:56 AM, P=ter Attia Was (is?) charging 5/44! From: jeffrey =. (mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ) Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 9:22 PM To: Peter Attia Subject: Re: Jim S nev
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 9:30 AM To: Peter Attia Subject: Re: Jim S yes, and he derserves it On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 12:56 AM, P=ter Attia Was (is?) charging 5/44! From: jeffrey =. (mailto:[email protected] <mai
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 4:22 AM To: Peter Attia Subject: Re: Jim S never met On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 8:38 PM,
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 4:22 AM To: Peter Attia Subject: Re: Jim S never met On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Peter Attia cmailto > wrote: Do you know Jim Simons (personally)? Peter Attia </=pan> I (m) I mo o)
From: Peter Attia Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 4:56 AM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Jim S Was (is?) charging 5/44! From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 9:22 PM To: Peter
From: Peter Attia Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 4:56 AM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Jim S Was (is?) charging 5/44! From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 9:22 PM To: Peter Attia Subject: Re: J
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 10:07 AM To: Peter Attia Subject: Re: Jim S steve cohen took 501 On Sat, Sep 19, 2015
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 10:07 AM To: Peter Attia Subject: Re: Jim S steve cohen took 501 On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Pete= Attia > wrote: Do you know Jim Simons (personally)? Peter Attia </=pan> '917-232-1148
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:46 PM To: Peter Attia Subject: Re: Jim S never met On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Pe
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:46 PM To: Peter Attia Subject: Re: Jim S never met On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Peter Attia wrote: Do you know Jim Simons well? Peter Attia I Nu=rition Science Initiative (NuSI) <ht
From: Peter Attia Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:58 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Jim S Had a long call with Eva this morning. Your name came up plenty. Also spoke with Bernie briefly yesterday. Will fill you in. Sti
From: Peter Attia Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:58 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Jim S Had a long call with Eva this morning. Your name came up plenty. Also spoke with Bernie briefly yesterday. Will fill you in. Still in LSJ? From: j
From: Peter Attia Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 2:38 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Jim S What? 50% of AUM and only 1% of returns, or the reverse? From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Sunday, Septembe
From: Peter Attia Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 2:38 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Jim S What? 50% of AUM and only 1% of returns, or the reverse? From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 3:07 AM T
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Jim S