Epstein Secrets

From: on behalf of Ben Goertzel Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 12:17 AM To: Jeffrey E. Cc: Joscha Bach Subject: Re: Hi, I agree w/ Joscha's caution about discrimination tasks: They can be often be solved rather well, but in devious wa

t they would be doing the world a big service along the way ;-D Interesting thought-direction, anyhow... ! -- Ben On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:23 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > I dont want statistical modeling you and ben for years have stated you > wanted to put an avatar, and hope it can do

Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 12:17 AM To: Jeffrey E. Cc: Joscha Bach Subject: Re: Hi, I agree

quite complex structures. The winning approach would then not be able to work on another language for which there was no large annotated corpus (no Penn Treebank analogue, etc.). It seems that challenges are easier to formulate for engineering breakthroughs than science breakthroughs... Here is one idea, off

From: on behalf of Ben Goertzel < Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 12:17 AM To: Jeffrey E. Cc: Joscha Bach Subject: Re: Hi, I agree w/ Joscha's caution about discrimination tasks: They can be often be solved rather well, but in devious wa

t they would be doing the world a big service along the way ;-D Interesting thought-direction, anyhow... ! -- Ben On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:23 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > I dont want statistical modeling you and ben for years have stated you > wanted to put an avatar, and hope it can do

Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 12:17 AM To: Jeffrey E. Cc: Joscha Bach Subject: Re: Hi, I agree

quite complex structures. The winning approach would then not be able to work on another language for which there was no large annotated corpus (no Penn Treebank analogue, etc.). It seems that challenges are easier to formulate for engineering breakthroughs than science breakthroughs... Here is one idea, off

ld pass the preschool IQ tests, but it would be the most interesting way with the most long-term promise... -- Ben On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > hilbert did questions ? im open for ideas looking to encourage work > based on the concept of coherence. or sense m

I Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 1:16 AM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: I think that "learning languag

» complex structures. The winning approach would then not be able to » work on another language for which there was no large annotated » corpus (no Penn Treebank analogue, etc.). » It seems that challenges are easier to formulate for engineering » breakthroughs than science breakthroughs... » Here is one id

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 12:43 AM To: Ben Goertzel Subject: Re: hilbert did questions ? im open for ideas looki

how... ! -- Ben On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacatio=@gma

e=br> complex structures. The winning approach would then not be able=to work on another language for which there was no large annotated corpus (no Penn Treebank analogue, etc.). It seems that challenges are easier to formulate for engineering breakthroughs than science breakthroughs... Here is one idea, off

ld pass the preschool IQ tests, but it would be the most interesting way with the most long-term promise... -- Ben On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > hilbert did questions ? im open for ideas looking to encourage work > based on the concept of coherence. or sense m

rtzel Sent: on ay, eptem er , 015 1:16 AM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: I think that "learning languag

» complex structures. The winning approach would then not be able to » work on another language for which there was no large annotated » corpus (no Penn Treebank analogue, etc.). » It seems that challenges are easier to formulate for engineering » breakthroughs than science breakthroughs... » Here is one id