Epstein Secrets

From: Eileen Alexanderson < To: 'Jeffrey Epstein' <jeevaeation(igmail.com> Subject: FW: 2012 Apollo Tax Estimate - LB Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 18:56:15 +0000 Attachments: Apollo_2012_Tax_Estimates _

From: Eileen Alexanderson < To: 'Jeffrey Epstein' <jeevaeation(igmail.com> Subject: FW: 2012 Apol

From: Eileen Alexanderson < To: 'Jeffrey Epstein' <jeevaeation(igmail.com> Subject: FW: 2

en Alexanderson Cc: Elliot Becker Subject: 2012 Apollo Tax Estimate - LB Tom & Eileen: Please see the attached final 2012 Apollo Tax Estimate for Leon et al. We have included a comparison from the last version, you can consider this estimate as final and it will generally match the 2012 K-1's. Please not

To: Eileen Alexanderson From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Mon 4/1/2013 7:01:39 PM Subject: Re: FW: 2012 Apollo Tax Estimate - LB total tax due for 2012? and estimate for 2013 On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 a

To: Eileen Alexanderson From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Mon 4/1/2013 7:01:39 PM Subject: Re: FW:

To: Eileen Alexanderson From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Mon 4/1/2013 7:01:39 PM Subject:

en Alexanderson Cc: Elliot Becker Subject: 2012 Apollo Tax Estimate - LB Tom & Eileen: Please see the attached final 2012 Apollo Tax Estimate for Leon et al. We have included a comparison from the last version, you can consider this estimate as final and it will generally match the 2012 K- 1's. Please no

un 17, 2014, at 8:54 AM, Lesley Groff < > wrote: >> Hi Rich..the 4pm meeting with Leon et al on Thursday is at Leon's office...is there any reason Jeffrey would want Alan to be a part of the beginning of this meeting? I ask because y'all are currently meeting at 3pm with Alan at JE's house...just wonde

ere any reason Jeffrey would want Alan to be a part of the beginning of this meeting? I ask because y'all are currently meeting at 3pm with Alan at JE's house...just wondering if it should be at Leon's office instead_? >> >> On Jun 16, 2014, at 4:51 PM, Richard Kahn wrote: >> >>> ok great >>>

nue 4th Floor > New York, NY 10022 > cell > fax > cel > On Jun 17, 2014, at 8:54 AM, Lesley Groff < > wrote: >> Hi Rich..the 4pm meeting with Leon et al on Thursday is at Leon's office...is there any reason Jeffrey would want Alan to be a part of the beginning of this meeting? I ask because y'all ar

lan dlugash Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:54:52 +0000 Hi Rich..the 4pm meeting with Leon et al on Thursday is at Leon's of fice...is there any reason Jeffrey would want Alan to be a part of the beginning of this meeting? I ask because y'all are currently meeting at 3pm with Alan at JE's house...just wonde

ere any reason Jeffrey would want Alan to be a part of the beginning of this meeting? I ask because y'all are currently meeting at 3pm with Alan at JE's house...just wondering if it should be at Leon's office instead...? On Jun 16, 2014, at 4:51 PM, Richard Kahn < > wrote: > ok great > so i wil

From: Lesley Groff To: Richard Kahn <a Subject: Re: allan dlugash Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 12:54:52 +0000 Hi Rich..the 4pm meeting with Leon et al on Thursday is at Leon's of fice...is there any reason Jeffrey would want Alan to be a part of the beginning of this meeting? I ask because y'all

oan agreements regarding reproduction rights. At that time it was not clear whether Leon wanted me to be involved in this aspect of his planning. If Jeffrey and Eileen agree with my above understanding I will reach out to Diana Wierbicki and work with her on not yet signed art loan agreements. Ada Clapp

nce we have these doc's I need to synthesize with the insurance as Leon indicated all works are insured by the borrower during the loan period with Leon et al as the loss payees. My plan was to work with Haber once I got a full list. Please let me know so that we can work on a coordinated basis. Thanks E