3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
6 / 3
Mentions
From: Peter Thiel Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 6:45 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: FW: Jeff -- much longer discussion, but not sure I even made my questions clear= (1). I don't question that there is a line of evoluti
Thiel Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 6:45 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: FW: Jeff -- much longer discus
under w=ich deception is highly adaptive (and in this sense, it is quite compatibl= with the findings of science). I meant it more as a question of the soci=logy of science: If there is a lot of deception in science, then there ar= a lot of fake scientists trying to get government grant money and thereby=replace the re
From: Peter Thiel Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 6:45 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: FW: Jeff -- much longer discussion, but not sure I even made my questions clear= (1). I don't question that there is a line of evoluti
hiel Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 6:45 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: FW: Jeff -- much longer discus
under w=ich deception is highly adaptive (and in this sense, it is quite compatibl= with the findings of science). I meant it more as a question of the soci=logy of science: If there is a lot of deception in science, then there ar= a lot of fake scientists trying to get government grant money and thereby=replace the re
From: Peter Thiel Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 6:45 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: FW: Jeff -- much longer discussion, but not sure I even made my questions clear= (1). I don't question that there is a line of evoluti
hiel Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 6:45 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: FW: Jeff -- much longer discus
under w=ich deception is highly adaptive (and in this sense, it is quite compatibl= with the findings of science). I meant it more as a question of the soci=logy of science: If there is a lot of deception in science, then there ar= a lot of fake scientists trying to get government grant money and thereby=replace the re
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and the soci=logy of science