Epstein Secrets

To: Lisa Randall From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Fri 10/2/2009 9:35:45 PM Subject: Re: thanks , question , what does it look like if time is running backward , wouldn't it be decelerating„

s things accelerate as they approach„ charged would be as a result of the deceleration. On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Lisa Randall a wrote: Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there arc 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild, ch

To: Lisa Randall From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Fri 10/2/2009 9:35:45 PM Subject: Re: th

orizon scenario means time and space switch twice so at singularity you are back to ordinary time space identification. So let's first just consider Schwarschild (uncharged, not rotating). In that case you are on the right track. Reversing time and coming from the singularity, it pretty much looks like a 2d

ote: Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there arc 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild, charged, and Kerr. I didn't say much about Kerr--I mostly discussed charged-- since they are changing with time and a bit more complicated but indee

To: Jes Staley From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Fri 10/2/2009 9:36:14 PM Subject: Fwd: forward to your daughter Forwarded message From: Lisa Randall Date: Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:27 PM

ur daughter Forwarded message From: Lisa Randall Date: Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:27 PM Subject: Re: To: Jeffrey Epstein [email protected]>, Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there are 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild, ch

To: Jes Staley From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Fri 10/2/2009 9:36:14 PM Subject: Fwd: f

orizon scenario means time and space switch twice so at singularity you are back to ordinary time space identification. So let's first just consider Schwarschild (uncharged, not rotating). In that case you arc on the right track. Reversing time and coming from the singularity, it pretty much looks like a 2d

com>, Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there are 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild, charged, and Kerr. I didn't say much about Ken--I mostly discussed charged-- since they are changing with time and a bit more complicated but indeed

From: To: Sent: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein <* evacatio mail.com> Jes Staley < 10/212009 10:36:14 PM Fwd: forward to your daughter Forwarded messa e ------- From: Lisa Randall Date: Fri,

ghter Forwarded messa e ------- From: Lisa Randall Date: Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:27 PM Subject: Re: To: Jeffrey Epstein <ieevacationegmail.com>, Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there are 3 types of bits we might be discussing: Schwarschild, c

From: To: Sent: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein <* evacatio mail.com> Jes Staley < 10/212009 1

orizon scenario means time and space switch twice so at singularity you are back to ordinary time space identification. So let's first just consider Schwarschild (uncharged, not rotating). In that case you are on the right track. Reversing time and coming from the singularity, it pretty much looks like a 2d b

To: Lisa Randall Fran: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Fri 10/2/2009 10:03:37 PM Subject Re: joking, for me , space and time are disconnected as my fingers hunt for keys On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6

n't understand this last comment. EFTA_R1_00190010 EFTA01818027 On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Lisa Randall <mailt <math <mailt > wrote: Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there are 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild, c

To: Lisa Randall Fran: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Fri 10/2/2009 10:03:37 PM Subject Re: jo

izon scenario means time and space switch twice so at singularity you are back to ordinary time space identification. So let's first just consider Schwarschild (uncharged, not rotating). In that case you are on the right track. Reversing time and coming from the singularity, it pretty much looks like a 2

To: Lisa Randall From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Sun 10/4/2009 4:34:02 PM Subject: Re: 2pm? On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Lisa Randall wrote: Any availability in the spacetime continu

don't understand this last comment. On Fri. Oct 2.2009 at 5:27 PM, Lisa Randall <mailt <mailt <mailt <m <mailto: <ma <mailto: >>> wrote: Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there are 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild,

To: Lisa Randall From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Sun 10/4/2009 4:34:02 PM Subject: Re: 2p

zon scenario means time and space switch twice so at singularity you are back to ordinary time space identification. So let's first just consider Schwarschild (uncharged, not rotating). In that case you are on the right track. Reversing time and coming from the singularity, it pretty much looks like a 2

To: Lisa Randall From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Sun 10/4/2009 5:45:56 PM Subject: Re: if 2 is good is there a number to call? On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation

stand this last comment. On Fri Oct 2 2009 at 5:27 PM, Lisa Randall <mailto <mailto <mailto: <mailto <mailto <mailto <mailto: >>> wrote: Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there are 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild,

To: Lisa Randall From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Sun 10/4/2009 5:45:56 PM Subject: Re: if

zon scenario means time and space switch twice so at singularity you are back to ordinary time space identification. So let's first just consider Schwarschild (uncharged, not EFTA_R1_00191385 EFTA01819002 rotating). In that case you are on the right track. Reversing time and coming from the singulari

To: Lisa Randall From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Sun 10/4/2009 7:22:23 PM Subject: Re: 6 is fine or send number On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Lisa Randall e > wrote: What happened? I'l

<mailt <mailto <mailto <mailto: <mailto: <mailto <mailto <mailto: <mailt <mail <mailt <mailto: <mailto: <mailto <mailto: »» wrote: Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there are 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild

To: Lisa Randall From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Sun 10/4/2009 7:22:23 PM Subject: Re: 6

Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there are 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild, charged, and Kerr. I didn't say much about Kerr--I mostly discussed charged-- since they are changing with time and a bit more complicated but

0/4/2009 6:30:43 PM Subject: Re: What happened? I'll skip bad spacetime continuum joke. I'll be back about 6. Let me know if you will have time. Jeffrey Epstein wrote: > if 2 is good is there a number to call? > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected] > <mailto:jeevacation@g

ng the horizon . after crossing horizon there isn't really a cosmological interpretation anymore. Time and space have switched back. Randall Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there are 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild

To: Jeffrey Epstein[jeeyacation@gmaitcom] From: Lisa Randall Sent:

Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there are 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild, charged, and Kerr. I didn't say much about Kerr--I mostly discussed charged-- looking in reverse it appears things accelerate as they approach„

@gmail.com] From: Lisa Randall Sent: Fri 10/2/2009 10:12:19 PM Subject: Re: metric You can calculate the value of time and make a new metric. Jeffrey Epstein wrote: > joking, for me , space and time are disconnected as my fingers hunt for > keys > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Lisa Randall wrote: •

is last comment. confused. Or were you joking? > wrote: EFTA_R1_01510632 EFTA02437726 On Fri Oct 2 2009 at 5:27 PM Lisa Randall >>> wrote: Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there are 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild,

To: Jeffrey Epstein[[email protected]] From: Lisa Randall Sent

zon scenario means time and space switch twice so at singularity you are back to ordinary time space identification. So let's first just consider Schwarschild (uncharged, not rotating). In that case you are on the right track. Reversing time and coming from the singularity, it pretty much looks like a 2

To: Jeffrey Epstein[[email protected]] From: Lisa Randall Sent: Sun 10/4/2009 6:04:41 PM Subject: Re: you there? Jeffrey Epstein wrote: > if 2 is good is there a number to call? > • On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected] > <mailto:jeevacatio

approach„ charged would be as a result of the deceleration. don't understand this last comment. On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Lisa Randall Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there are 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild

To: Jeffrey Epstein[[email protected]] From: Lisa Randall Sent

Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there are 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild, charged, and Kerr. I didn't say much about Kerr--I mostly discussed charged-- > since they EFTA_R1_01510640 EFTA02437734 are changing with t