Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
9 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
5 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: Daphne Wallace To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: GSJ Minor Permit-Parcel Remainder A Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 20:36:01 +0000 Attachments: GSJ-_BINDER_PARCEL_A_(
to. Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:24 AM To: 'jeffrey E.'; 'Daphne Wallace' Subject: RE: GSJ Minor Permi
need to be shown and may actually create confusion if it is shown. JPW From: John P. Woods [mailto. Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:24 AM To: 'jeffrey E.'; 'Daphne Wallace' Subject: RE: GSJ Minor Permit-Parcel Remainder A EFTA00677709 I will remove the note on the tennis court. Where is holy shit po
From: Daphne Wallace To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: GSJ Minor P
cel Remainder A. I have removed the reference to the tennis court and the flagpole. The flagpole on "holy shit" point is part of the application for Parcel Remainder C-1. The flagpole on or near to Remainder A is a part of CZM Permit No. CZT-0S-17L. Therefore it doesn't need to be shown and may actually create confu
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
need to be shown and may actually create confusion if it is shown. JPW From: John P. Woods [mailto: Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:24 AM To: 'jeffrey E.'; 'Daphne Wallace' Subject: RE: GSJ Minor Permit-Parcel Remainder A I will remove the note on the tennis court. Where is holy shit point? If it is n
drawings that John submitted to you after addressing your feedback comments? Respectfully, Daphne On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:47 AM, John P. Woods Jeffrey, wrote: Attached are the revised drawings for Parcel Remainder A. I have removed the reference to the tennis court and the flagpole. The flagpole
cel Remainder A. I have removed the reference to the tennis court and the flagpole. The flagpole on "holy shit" point is part of the application for Parcel Remainder C-1. The flagpole on or near to Remainder A is a part of CZM Permit No. CZT-05-17L. Therefore it doesn't need to be shown and may actually create confu
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 7:08 PM To: John P. Woods, AIA Subject: Re: GSJ Minor Permit-Parcel Remainder A Yes . . O
holy shit point tennis court was already removed. . EFTA_R1_01878516 EFTA02643344 On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:32 AM, John P. Woods < , wrote: Jeffrey, <=pan style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-s=rif";color:#1f497d">Attached are the drawings for the two minor permi= applications. B
that point • M, John P. Woods wrote: I will remove the note on the tennis court. Where is holy =hit point? If it is not on Parcel Remainder A or Parcel Remainder C-1, it =ay get bumped into the major permit. Of course, if you had the location ap=roved before under Permit No. CZT-05-17, you don't need to show it=i
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: John P. Woods, AIA Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 6:41 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: Re: GSJ Minor Permit-Parcel Remainder A That is shown on the drawings for Rema=nder C-1, not Remainder A. </=iv> JPW Sent from my iPhone
at 11:23 AM, John P. Woods &l= wrote: I will remo=e the note on the tennis court. Where is holy shit point? If it is not on P=rcel Remainder A or Parcel Remainder C-1, it may get bumped into the major p=rmit. Of course, if you had the location approved before under Permit No. C=T-05-17, you don't need to show it i
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (3)
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Parcel Remainder C-1
