Epstein Secrets

020 21:36:56 +0000 EFTA00067607 Attachments: 03-09-2020.docx; 03-09-2020.pdf SDNY News Clips Monday, March 9, 2020 Contents Public Corruption Epstein MCC Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Navarro Terrorism and International Narcotics Schulte Violent and Organized Crime

n's Prince Andrew has declined to cooperate with a U.S. investigation into possible co- conspirators of deceased financier and accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, a U.S. prosecutor said on Monday. "Contrary to Prince Andrew's very public offer to cooperate with our investigation into Epstein's co-conspirators

of deceased financier and accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, a U.S. prosecutor said on Monday. "Cont

into question Attorney General Barr's credibility and in turn, the Department's representation" that it had properly redacted the Mueller report in the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit before the Court. The Justice Department released a statement taking issue with the judge's ruling, noting that its attorneys wo

tand corrected. We have no comment on this as usual, but FBI an MLAT was sent to the UK requesting information from Prince Andrew regarding both the Epstein and investigations. The MLAT was sent in early April. From: (NY) (FBI) Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 4:02 PM To: (NY) (FBI) < >; Subject: Re

MailOnline UK article Dear Sir, I'm a reporter from MailOnline in the UK. Can you confirm if a has asked to question Prince Andrew as part of the Jeffrey Epstine inquiry. Mutual Legal Assistance request has been submitted to British authorities in which the FBI We have been informed by a source that the requ

as asked to question Prince Andrew as part of the Jeffrey Epstine inquiry. Mutual Legal Assistance request

ional Press Office (m) (d) All correspondence contained in this e-mail, to include all names and associated contact information, may be subject to the Freedom of Information Act (P07A), 5 U.S.C. 4552. From: Sent: WeaR~Saay, Mp It 15, 2020 2:44 PM To: NPO < E> Subject: Re: comment required for MailOnline UK article D

15:27:53 +0000 Importance: Normal My apologies, I stand corrected, an MLAT was sent to the UK requesting information from Prince Andrew regarding Epstein and the investigation. From: Thoreson, Amy J. (NY) (FBI) Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 4:02 PM To: (NY) (FBI) < >.; Subject: Re: comment requ

MailOnline UK article Dear Sir, I'm a reporter from MailOnline in the UK. Can you confirm if a has asked to question Prince Andrew as part of the Jeffrey Epstine inquiry. Mutual Legal Assistance request has been submitted to British authorities in which the FBI We have been informed by a source that the requ

as asked to question Prince Andrew as part of the Jeffrey Epstine inquiry. Mutual Legal Assistance request

n FBI National Press Office All correspondence contained in this e-mail, to include all names and associated contact information, may be subject to the Freedom of Information Act (MIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552. From: vivek Chaudhary <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 2:44 PM To: NPO c > Subject: Re

s inquiry, but wanted to double check you're still on this course, since it's been a while since we had someone ask - MLA w/UK re: Prince Andrew and Epstein. FBI National Press Office (m) (d) All correspondence contained in this e-mail, to include all names and associated contoct information, may be s

m if a Mutual Legal Assistance request has been submitted to British authorities in which the FBI has asked to question Prince Andrew as part of the Jeffrey Epstine inquiry. We have been informed by a source that the request was sent tom, a director in the Home Office of the UK government. If you could inform

as asked to question Prince Andrew as part of the Jeffrey Epstine inquiry. We have been informed by a sour

ional Press Office (m) (d) All correspondence contained in this e-mail, to include all names and associated contoct information, may be subject to the Freedom of Information Act (F01,4), 5 U.S.C. 5 552. From Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 2:44 PM To: NPO < Subject: Re: comment required for MailOnline UK article Dea