3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
9 / 3
Mentions
-Defendant, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter- Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S OBJECTION AND RESPONSE TO IMPROPER FILING OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY INTRODUCTION In December 2009, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") filed suit against
-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S OBJECTION AND RESPONSE TO IMPROPER FILING OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY INTRODUCTION In December 2009, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") filed suit against Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") and Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"). In response to Epstein's lawsuit, Edwards filed a Countercla
COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, VS. SCOT
e subordinated to the inferior, and the judgments of the superior could only be enforced when they coincided with the judgments of the inferior."). In Systems Components, the Florida Supreme Court found that it was "improper" for a party to do what Edwards seeks to do in the case at hand; argue that the Court ignore
-Defendant, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter- Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S OBJECTION AND RESPONSE TO IMPROPER FILING OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY INTRODUCTION In December 2009, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") filed suit against
-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S OBJECTION AND RESPONSE TO IMPROPER FILING OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY INTRODUCTION In December 2009, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") filed suit against Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") and Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"). In response to Epstein's lawsuit, Edwards filed a Countercla
COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, VS. SCOT
e subordinated to the inferior, and the judgments of the superior could only be enforced when they coincided with the judgments of the inferior."). In Systems Components, the Florida Supreme Court found that it was "improper" for a party to do what Edwards seeks to do in the case at hand; argue that the Court ignore
-Defendant, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter- Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION INTRODUCTION In December 2009, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") filed suit against Sc
TER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION INTRODUCTION In December 2009, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") filed suit against Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") and Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"). In response to Epstein's lawsuit, Edwards filed a Countercla
OUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA0408003OOOCMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, VS. SCOT
e subordinated to the inferior, and the judgments of the superior could only be enforced when they coincided with the judgments of the inferior."). In Systems Components, the Florida Supreme Court found that it was "improper" for a party to do what Edwards seeks to do in the case at hand; argue that the Court ignore
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and In Systems Components

George Mitchell
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSONTonja Haddad Coleman
PERSON
Foreman
PERSONWright
PERSONthe District of Columbia
LOCATIONWolfe
PERSONLevin
PERSONOlson
PERSONthe Florida Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONSteinberg
PERSONMabie
PERSONEchevarria
PERSON
McCalla
PERSONBarrett & Frappier
ORGANIZATIONThomas, Mayes & Mitchell
ORGANIZATIONTraynor
PERSONDelMonico
ORGANIZATIONU.S. Fire Ins. Co.
ORGANIZATION