Epstein Secrets

ions with the New York City Probation Office were unusual. Mr. Hoffenberg was told he was not allowed to speak to certain individuals, including Mr. Jeffrey Epstein and that his ability to work was limited. 18. On November 15, 2013, Mr. Hoffenberg's probation officers filed sealed papers against Mr. Hoffenberg

g be permitted to engage in any occupation as long as it was not with Towers Financial and that he could speak with anyone he wished, including Mr. Epstein, from whom Mr. Hoffenberg believed he could possibly collect a large debt. In doing so, Judge Sweet removed the barriers to Mr. Hoffenberg working

ed to speak to certain individuals, including Mr. Jeffrey Epstein and that his ability to work was limited

he could speak with anyone he wished, including Mr. Epstein, from whom Mr. Hoffenberg believed he could poss

of the Towers Financial fraud, Mr. Hoffenberg, following his release from incarceration on October 11, 2013 and (B) the retention of our firm by Mr. Rey Marques, one of the victims of the Towers Financial fraud. 5. We, respectfully, would like to offer more facts to explain why we do not believe that our

on to take notes during his meetings with probation officers.° (Petition at 10-15.) The petition asserts that a non- party "multi-billionaire" named Jeffrey Epstein can "easily" provide for restitution through his "over one hundred billion dollar hedge fund" that was formed with Hoffenberg's assistance. (Petiti

at a non- party "multi-billionaire" named Jeffrey Epstein can "easily" provide for restitution through his

serts that a non- party "multi-billionaire" named Jeffrey Epstein can "easily" provide for restitution thro

portion of the population of the country of Cape Verde. (Petition at 3.) The petition identifies only one petitioner, however: an individual named Rey Marques, whose "Emergency Retainer Agreement" with Mintz & Prude is annexed to the petition. (Petition at 3 & Ex. A.) Marques claims to have "been a witness

on to take notes during his meetings with probation officers.4 (Petition at 10-15.) The petition asserts that a non- party "multi-billionaire" named Jeffrey Epstein can "easily" provide for restitution through his "over one hundred billion dollar hedge fiord" that was formed with Hoffenberg's assistance. (Petit

at a non- party "multi-billionaire" named Jeffrey Epstein can "easily" provide for restitution through his

serts that a non- party "multi-billionaire" named Jeffrey Epstein can "easily" provide for restitution thro

portion of the population of the country of Cape Verde. (Petition at 3.) The petition identifies only one petitioner, however: an individual named Rey Marques, whose "Emergency Retainer Agreement" with Mintz & Fraade is annexed to the petition. (Petition at 3 & Ex. A.) Marques claims to have "been a witnes