Epstein Secrets

@M(1 EFTA00191518 Epstein, Jeffre Fed ex Sat delivery on cro Dan and Nancy SHtin ro NM fny ' ay Land 87056 on Store t 505 8 2 4339 Epsteanin, Jeffrey Zone Ren 49 Zorro Ranch Road Stanley. NM 87056 Email: zorroranch@aol_corn 5 832 2696 Line 2 office) 5 1 832 2675 Line 1 Cite) 5 5 El

4IL 33480 561 1 r if) 561 561 1- 93 (hi) 581 881 3 91 -5748 Voice Mad (h) Elwes, Anabel 41A Limerston Street 0 Lon 0do629 n S 5955W10 27- Epstein, Ed 430 East 86th 0001 8 wwwwwwwerwersagarannintr," ~8W Erba Noona r0o e boons 39 2)47 510(w(h) 39025500 ) Espirito Santo, Manuel and Ros gg

rn (Hm}1800 skyPage 917940 6157 (py lea Blachon, Magali 1100 Toulouse. 11 33 68 2917179Tnce aricialitighz cregoi r 0010110VCIO Parents Epstein, Jeffrey 9 Eyt 71 10021 h) rotect HmN.forcGar 24 East 63rd Account* 7..EP02 14' 917 1 309 1 917 45 QI) r,ichael fp 59 Dennis • F owers 'P P)ge

Devito, Dawn 7 ki Atlan Ave. nda 33480 rn Sant St atenown MA , F 3t2 +An Pa:hat:act Home 41-4-931485tede island Driver - PB 305 491 1998 Ray Epstein, Jeffrey . ,el spnng 126Lka Rebega Drive 358 Ei Bon Way _ ___, Palm Beach, F 334ou <.?",Y1, oiql.4' Vest 7 2 New Suburban Staff Suburban st

harbe and 323 933-8783 Domestic only rte. brolumMohn 800 239 6269 Virgin specialist TWA 001 800 221 2000 X188925144 frequent lief num. WEMI (JE) frequent Mr number United Airlines 001 800 241 6522 #00385250614 frequent Met # 00316924999 frequent flyer X J.E. US Air Frequent Travel*, Ce

4 014 • 7 2 9 7 331 441 7 1 quest line 331 44 8 455 Ms Guerin 1 :12 90 Ms eres(conc.) 79 Ms. Pens 09 592 853 Ms. Peres (p) 1 44 01 4401 ktr. Stephane Epstein, Jeffrey (G) Stanch Aphronone 22 Avenue Apartment 20 Psris. Franca 5116 331 441 70 10 331 441 TO 11if) Email: epsteinab! nnadoo.frtyalds (Hm

el- ernewenues) N908JE 917 497 4880 spare 727 p 11 881 6314 54353 satellite - 0,111M881 6314 54123 sateSte - 8i1" 17 545 6300 Guest cel Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein interests AlWm 4 64548 457 Madison il 10 Ave022nue - ath Floor Al 'e---- EFTA00191564 7 - • ( Unleg rATIA " 131runi .."•> 2013 203 9 iiit

ie. Bowan on the Water 58t 2871 6154 2Lq El'287 758 2871 Jana Bashani r ssimard 207 7581/2 ø r) 1451 820 brM home 0207 758 28 Hov a 331 IS Hovnanian, Shaunt Hovanian Group 520 !avast* River Road Red Sta. NJ 07701 (h) plr: 12 gati-ilsriiiiiigrskpld Blvd 2-8200 2789 -6511 Say 908-741.0076 (b

NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indivi

you put into Q-task regarding the claims against Mr. Epstein? Edwards had filed suits against Epstein on beha

rrett, 742 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999. Therefore, if the answer was evident from the complaint eventually filed by Edwards ("to seek redress from Jeffrey Epstein"), it would not be privileged. Likewise, if L.M. had initially hired Edwards to consult him about a claim she never pursued, the subject might argua

lm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 on Friday, April 1, at 9:00 a.m., the following: EPSTEIN'S AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION OF PLAINTIFF TO OVERRULE OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL DEFENDANT EDWARDS TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AND APPEAR FOR FURTHER DEPOS

d work product privilege without conducting an in camera inspection of items in question to determine whether claimed privileges apply); Skorman v. Hovnanian of Florida, Inc., 382 So. 2d 1376, 1378-79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Use of an in camera examination also applies to testimony a witness seeks to protect

SE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. / PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS BY DEFENDANT BRADLEY EDWARDS AND FOR SANCTIONS Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned

onse to several orders entered by Judge Raymond Ray in the Bankruptcy Court, filed a one hundred and fifty-nine (159) page privilege EFTA00582857 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards DRAFT 2/3/12 4:26 PM Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Div. AG log, claiming that over two thousand (2000) documents are pri

ted to block the discovery of communications that are not identified as attorney-client communications. See, e.g.,, §90.502, Fla. Stat., Skorman v. Hovnanian of Florida, Inc., 382 So. 2d 1376, 1378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Accordingly, no attorney-client privilege attaches to communications that have not bee