Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
7 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Subject: Fwd: Date
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Subject: Fwd:
ividually, and in his representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to MI Is the stated sum correct? Also, there is a reference in recital K
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: "Martin B. O'Connor II" To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> CC: Siegal Peggy Subject: Fwd: Siegal--Peggy_Settlement Agreement.DOC Attorney-Client Privileged Communication Date: Thu, 20
odate some of the changes requested by Ms. Dyce but holding firm on the amount and on the prevailing party attorney fee provision. I also addressed Jeffrey's points below. Jim 1. The note from Gary's attorney at the top of the Settlement Agreement about Peggy being required to sign and deliver to Gar
ividually, and in his representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. I agree. EFTA00626193 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to Peggy. Is the stated sum correct? Also, there
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: "Martin O'Connor" cz
ividually, and in his representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to MI Is the stated sum correct? Also, there is a reference in recital K
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 5:03 PM To: Peggy Siegal Subject: Fwd: Forwarded messag= From: jeffrey E. <jeevaca
ividually, and in his representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to Peggy. Is the stated sum correct? Also, there is a reference in recita=
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 1:16 AM To: Martin O'Connor Peggy Siegal 1.The note from Gary's attorney at the top of
ividually, and in his representative capacities as trustee of the Marital Trust and the Annette Trust and as Person Representative of the Estate of Annette Siegel. 3. Recital K appears to be the basis for the consideration to be given to Peggy. Is the stated sum correct? Also, there is a reference in recita=
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (9)
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Annette Siegel
PS
Peggy Siegal
PERSON4,216 w/ Jeffrey·3 w/ Annette
the Marital Trust
ORGANIZATION49 w/ Jeffrey·5 w/ Annette
Trusts
ORGANIZATION44 w/ Jeffrey·5 w/ Annette
MO
Martin O'Connor
PERSON40 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ Annette
the Estate of Annette Siegel
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Jeffrey·5 w/ Annette
the Annette Trust
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Jeffrey·5 w/ Annette
Recital K
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Jeffrey·5 w/ Annette
UP
ut Peggy
PERSON2 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ Annette
G=
Gary =
PERSON2 w/ Jeffrey·2 w/ Annette