Epstein Secrets

02/01/2012 16:11 FAX 5616845816 SEARCY DENNEY liboovois JEF v REY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, SCOTT ROTHSTELN, individually, BRAD I LEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and individually, Defendant, 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FI

, EPSTEIN alleges that EDWARDS engaged in discovery without "leg timate purpose" by asking three of EPSTEIN's jet pilots about sexual activities on EPS1TEIN's aircraft. Second Amended Complaint at I 32(1). To defend against this allegation, ED .WARDS is now entitled to ask EPSTEIN whether he was sexually

AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOOOvIBAG DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, RESPONSE IN dPPOSITION TO JEFFERY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER RBLATING TO HIS DEPOSITION AND IN SUPPORT OF EDWARDS' MOTINO TO COMPEL AND IMPOSE SANCTIONS j Defendant/Counterplai

effrey Epstein's (hereinafter EPSTELN) motion for a protective orde[ and to terminate his deposition. The motion is ffivolous and should be denied. EPSTEIN has filed a Complaint against EDWARDS that alleges that EDWARDS filed lawsltits making "unfounded . . . sexual allegations" and pleading "a causc of

in opposition to Plan tiff/Counterdefendant, Jeffrey Epstein's (hereinafter EPSTELN) motion for a prot

aim. I want to know about the connection between Mr. Epstein and each one of those alleged victims. I want to

iate, state and federal law. These RICO claims alleged that it was no accident that young girls like his clients L. , E.W. and Jane Doe ended up in EPSTE1N's mansion where he sexually abused them. Inst d, the RICO claims contended that EPSTEIN ran an entire criminal organization that was desiLn ed to s

ntiff, Bradley J. Edwards (hereinafter EDWARDS), by and throligh his undersigned attomeys, respectfully responds in opposition to Plan tiff/Counterdefendant, Jeffrey Epstein's (hereinafter EPSTELN) motion for a protective orde[ and to terminate his deposition. The motion is ffivolous and should be denied

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XDOCXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant(s). MOTION TO COMPEL DIS

pley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach Florida 33409 Phone Fax: Attorney for BRADLEY J. EDWARDS EFTA00613793 Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Motion to Compel Discovery COUNSEL LIST Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite

UNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XDOCXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, in

notice that pursuant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that Net Worth Interrogatories numbered 1 through 13 have been directed to Counterdefendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, this ti day of December, 2012. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counse

t, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, moves this Honorable Court to compel timely responses to his financial discovery requests and in support would show that the Counterdefendant, through counsel, in the email attached has expressed an intention to delay the provision of responses beyond the time provided by the applicable Ru

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXIVIBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendant(s). NOTICE OF SERVICE OF I

Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorney for Bradley J. Edwards EFTA00788596 EDWARDS ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMI3AG COUNSEL LIST Jack A. Gold Marc S. Nurik,l uire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue Sout

NTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXIVIBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, in

notice that pursuant to Rule 1.340(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, that Net Worth Interrogatories numbered 1 through 13 have been directed to Counterdefendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, this ti A clay of December, 2012. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Coun