Epstein Secrets

From: Boris Nikolic To: "Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected])" <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 21:43:26 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.gif Please see a comm

B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't have to come out of pocket for the $400k up front. I just want to make sure you understand the clawback exposu

From: Boris Nikolic To: "Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected])" <[email protected]>

6 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.gif Please see a comment below. What do you think? Gunderson was always very worry about clawback issue B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is a

From: Boris Nikolic <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 5:02 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected]) Subject: FW: FYI Please let me know what do you think. B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Monday, Apr

: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 5:02 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected]) Subject: FW: FYI Plea

m> Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 5:02 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected]) Subject: FW: F

Wednesday, April 8, 2015 5:02 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected]) Subject: FW: FYI Please let me know what do you think. B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 9:50 PM To: Boris Nikolic Cc: Bennett L Yee Subject: RE: Hi Boris, Peter seemed to think t

From: Boris Nikolic Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 9:43 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected]) Subject: FW: Please see a comment below. What do you think? Gunderson was always very worry about clawback issue B Fro

ck issue B From: Steve R. Ray Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't have to come out of pocket for the $400k up front. I just want to make sure you understand the clawback exposu

Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 9:43 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein ([email protected]) Subject: FW: Please se

not the intended recipient, please immediately delete this email and any attachments. From: Boris Nikolic Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 11:06 AM To: Steve R. Ray Subject: RE: Hi Steve, I am planning to sign this and send it today to Peter. Please can you just take a quick look. Currently I am offering 50%

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Boris Nikolic Subjec

B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto ] Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't have to come out of pocket for the $400k up front. I just want to make sure you understand the clawback exposu

t 5:43 PM, Boris Nikolic < > wrote: Please see a comment below. What do you think? Gunderson was always very worry about clawback issue B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto ] Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is

From: Boris Nikolic To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Subject: RE: FW: Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 21:55:15 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.gif OK Just a quick question — do I need so

B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto: Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't have to come out of pocket for the $400k up front. I just want to make sure you understand the clawback exposu

t 5:43 PM, Boris Nikolic < > wrote: Please see a comment below. What do you think? Gunderson was always very worry about clawback issue B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto: Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is

w life as you and how I was careless to whom I associate myself with!!!= How bizzare and paradoxical this 'sill! Sent from my Windows Phone From: jeffrey E.<=r> Sent: Q=8E4/8/2015 9:25 PM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: FW= my suggestion is that i talk directly to david, this=is silly and unproductive On

that i talk directly to david, this=is silly and unproductive On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Boris Nikolic > wrote: What would you do?=u> From: jeffre= E. [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 5:13 PM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: FW: no, EFTA_R

570 EFTA02683226 On Wed A r 8 2015 at 1:02 PM, Boris Nikolic <mailto > wrote: FYI</=> Please let me know wha= do you think. B=/p> <=> From: Steve R. Ray [mailtc j Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 9:50 PM To: Boris Nikolic Cc: Bennett L. Yee Subject: RE: Hi Boris, Peter seemed to think =hat something

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 9:52 PM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: FW: the clawback is not davids problem., it is yours.40

ry about clawback issue B From: Steve Ray Sent: Monday, To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, wrote: I realize from your persp=ctive that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't h=ve to come out of pocket for the $400k up front. I just want to make=sure you understand the clawback exposu

ent. If you are not th= intended recipient, please immediately delete this email and any attachme=ts. From: Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 11:06 AM To: Steve R. Ray Subject: RE: Hi Steve,</=pan> I am planning to sign thi= and send it today to Peter. Please can you just take = quick look. Currently I am offer

From: Boris Nikolic Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 9:55 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: FW: OK Just a quick question — do I need something like that this promissory notes expires on May 15th or so. If they do not counter

EFTA_R1_01630533 EFTA02502308 Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't have to come out of pocket for the $400k up front. I just want to make sure you understand the clawback exposu

2015 at 5:43 PM, Boris Nikolic rote: Please see a comment below. What do you think? Gunderson was always very worry about clawback issue B From: Steve R. Ray EFTA_R1_01630533 EFTA02502308 Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective tha

attachme=ts. From: Boris Ni=olic Sent: Sunday, May Fina To: Steve R. Ray Subject: FW: </=> HI Steve=/u> </=> Please find attached a do=ument Jeffrey's attorney wrote. This is in line what Jeff=ey discussed with Peter. It seems much easier stru=ture (and better for me as it does not tie up my 400

d recipient. If you are not th= intended recipient, please immediately delete this email and any attachme=ts. From: Boris Ni=oli Sent: Monday, To: Steve R. Ray Subject: RE: Hi Steve, <1=> I am planning to sign thi= and send it today to Peter. <1=> Please can you just take = quick look. <1=> Currently

From: Steve R. Ray [mailto Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't have to come out of pocket for the 5400k up front. I just want to make sure you understand the clawback exposu

From: Steve R. Ray [mailto Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is a