7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
VR materials l=t First, I have reviewed all that has been produced and it is quite obvious (especially after comparing what was produced to us by Epstein in 2010) that there is a large volume of emails and other correspondence that has not been produced. So, preliminarily, can you give us a timetable
e? Specifically, should we have received an RFP_1? Thanks you in advance for darifying this point. Brad and I are working on a filing in response to the Epstein Motion for Protective Order that we may need to file in the next 24 hours, so we'd appreciate clarity on this point soon. Thanks again for all your help.
; imageOO8.jpg Hi First, I have reviewed all that has been produced and it is quite obvious (especially after comparing what was produced to us by Epstein in 2010) that there is a large volume of emails and other correspondence that has not been produced. So, preliminarily, can you give us a timetable
e? Specifically, should we have received an RFP_1? Thanks you in advance for darifying this point. Brad and I are working on a filing in response to the Epstein Motion for Protective Order that we may need to file in the next 24 hours, so we'd appreciate clarity on this point soon. Thanks again for all your help.
: :Discovery an materials After our conference call, I went back through the e-mails and attempted to match up the production you received from Epstein. I have attached what I have located so far. On some of the e-mails, I have redacted the header and message, which is a forwarding of an e-mail from
else? Specifically, should we have received an RFP_1? Thanks you in advance for darifying this point. and I are working on a filing in response to the Epstein Motion for Protective Order that we may need to file in the next 24 hours, so we'd appreciate clarity on this point soon. Thanks again for all your help.
oduction; (2) VR materials Paul and Brad, The government has not produced all the correspondence requested. I am working on correspondence between Epstein's attorneys and the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Unit, which I should be able to e-mail tomorrow. is also working on additional material to be
e? Specifically, should we have received an RFP_1? Thanks you in advance for darifying this point. Brad and I are working on a filing in response to the Epstein Motion for Protective Order that we may need to file in the next 24 hours, so we'd appreciate clarity on this point soon. Thanks again for all your help.
one through the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS) files, although I have included the May 15, 2008 letter from the CEOS Chief advising Epstein's attorneys that the United States Attorney was acting within his discretion in prosecuting the case. On the documents pertaining to Epstein's app
e? Specifically, should we have received an RFP_1? Thanks you in advance for darifying this point. Brad and I are working on a filing in response to the Epstein Motion for Protective Order that we may need to file in the next 24 hours, so we'd appreciate clarity on this point soon. Thanks again for all your help.
reference to materials from the Deputy Attorney General's Office. We have already provided him the documents we received from the DAG's Office, when Epstein appealed his case to then Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, in May-June 2008. There are likely other documents which the U.S. Attorney's Office di
e? Specifically, should we have received an RFP_1? Thanks you in advance for darifying this point. Brad and I are working on a filing in response to the Epstein Motion for Protective Order that we may need to file in the next 24 hours, so we'd appreciate clarity on this point soon. Thanks again for all your help.
(2), materials Hi First, I have reviewed all that has been produced and it is quite obvious (especially after comparing what was produced to us by Epstein in 2010) that there is a large volume of emails and other correspondence that has not been produced. So, preliminarily, can you give us a timetable
e? Specifically, should we have received an RFP_1? Thanks you in advance for darifying this point. Brad and I are working on a filing in response to the Epstein Motion for Protective Order that we may need to file in the next 24 hours, so we'd appreciate clarity on this point soon. Thanks again for all your help.
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and the Epstein Motion

Bradley Edwards
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
Salt Lake City
LOCATIONMarie
PERSON
Dexter Lee
PERSON
Weissing
PERSONJaffe
PERSON
the University of Utah
ORGANIZATION
S.J. Quinney College of Law
ORGANIZATION
Ronald N. Boyce
PERSONEastern
LOCATIONthe Utah State Bar
ORGANIZATIONthe Child Exploitation
ORGANIZATION