Epstein Secrets

@pathtojustice.com> Cc: "Brad Edwards ([email protected])" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Epstein's Request for Prospective Intervention -- no conference among the parties Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:39:58 +0000 Importance: Normal Dear Jackie, W

rospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings," DE 207. However, in reviewing the motion, we did not see the statement of Pre-Filing Conference, required by the Court's Local Rules. See Local Rule 7.1(A)(3). This requirement cannot be ignored, and we would like the opportunity to confer wit

[email protected]> Cc: "Brad Edwards ([email protected])" <[email protected]>, "Marvin Simeon" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Epstein's Request for Prospective Intervention -- no conference among the parties Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:43:47 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Paul, Thank

rospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings," DE 207. However, in reviewing the motion, we did not see the statement of Pre-Filing Conference, required by the Court's Local Rules. See Local Rule 7.1(A)(3). This requirement cannot be ignored, and we would like the opportunity to confer wit

ljchian Subject: RE: complete email list Hi Jackie and Perhaps tomorrow you can help us by making sure we have all the right email contacts for the Epstein side of the case and the Government side of the case. That way, we have a convenient way to correspond with everyone on issue of interest. Paul Pa

rospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings," DE 207. However, in reviewing the motion, we did not see the statement of Pre-Filing Conference, required by the Court's Local Rules. See Local Rule 7.1(A)(3). This requirement cannot be ignored, and we would like the opportunity to confer wit

ce.com) Subject: RE: complete email list Hi Jackie and Perhaps tomorrow you can help us by making sure we have all the right email contacts for the Epstein side of the case and the Government side of the case. That way, we have a convenient way to correspond with everyone on issue of interest. Paul Pa

rospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings," DE 207. However, in reviewing the motion, we did not see the statement of Pre-Filing Conference, required by the Court's Local Rules. See Local Rule 7.1(A)(3). This requirement cannot be ignored, and we would like the opportunity to confer wit