Epstein Secrets

_Uniyersity_Rankings_-_SRF_scholars_(PDF_notes_only).pdf; FY09- I O_Uniyersity_Rankings_-_SRF_scholart(PDF_notes_only)(1).pdf Henry: In response to Jeffrey's note about the quality of the universities that host SRF scholars, please find the attached ranking list of the current academic-year SRF hosts.

lIE) From: Dr. Henry Jarecki [maitto: Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:32 PM To: Miller, Jim Subject: FW: FW: ISI Database EFTA00780260 From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 10 20:09 To: Dr. Henry Jarecki Subject: Re: FW: ISI Database I would gladly , however it

W: FW: ISI Database EFTA00780260 From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, A

same time, we put the scholars' information into Scopus Citation Tracker and Google Scholar. The results were inconsistent and more "hits' came from Scopus and Google Scholar than ISI. From speaking with the SRF staff who took this task, I learned that there were a large number of packages available for

ble for the ISI trail subscription and I am thinking that maybe the correct one for this job was not selected. I would be grateful if you would ask Jeffrey the specific ISI package that he uses. As well, I believe that our trial subscription has expired and it would be great if it were at all possible t

ame time, we put the scholars' information into Scopus Citation Tracker and Google Scholar. The results were inconsistent and more "hits' came from Scopus and Google Scholar than ISI. From speaking with the SRF staff who took this task, I learned that there were a large number of packages available for

ble for the ISI trail subscription and I am thinking that maybe the correct one for this job was not selected. I would be grateful if you would ask Jeffrey the specific 151 package that he uses. As well, I believe that our trial subscription has expired and it would be great if it were at all possible t

ame time, we put the scholars' information into Scopus Citation Tracker and Google Scholar. The results were inconsistent and more "hits' came from Scopus and Google Scholar than 151. From speaking with the SRF staff who took this task, I learned that there were a large number of packages available for