4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
5 / 4
Mentions
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky < Subj
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky <
time I met Carnap. He couldn't understand why people talked languages, with all their irregularities and complexity. Why doesn't everyone just talk Esperanto (which, he didn't realize, just uses standard Romance grammar with very minor changes)? Or better, why don't we all talk predicate calculus? Frege,
n it. Quite a departure from a rich tradition which in the modern period goes back to Galileo and the great figures of modern science. Noam From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2015 1:46 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: I told ehud , how you and valeria were both tho
time I met Carnap. He couldn't understand why people talked languages, with all their irregularities and complexity. Why doesn't everyone just talk Esperanto (which, he didn't realize, just uses standard Romance grammar with very minor changes)? Or better, why don't we all talk predicate calculus? Frege,
To: Jeffrey [email protected]] From: Sent: Subject: also Sat 9/25/2010 10:52:05 PM "fixing europes single currency" special section interesting.
ther is hard bd of moving targets. Would the proposed "unec" change all that? Was thinking last night that the "unec" if not done well could be the Esperanto of the economic world. Also I need new sunglasses and my nose is more French than American. On one of your walkabouts in Paris will you scope out s
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, September 6, 2015 8:14 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: ill work on the 16th <=r> On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at
time I met Carnap. He couldn't understand why people tal=ed languages, with all their irregularities and complexity. Why doesn't everyone just talk Esperanto (which, he didn =80 t realize, just uses standard Romance grammar with very minor changes=? Or better, why don't we all talk predicate calculus? F
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Esperanto