Epstein Secrets

HE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES THERETO Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffr

RIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES THERETO Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rules 1.280 and 1.380 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby requests that this

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

tion with Edwards's prosecution of cases against Mr. Epstein before and after Edwards joined RRA. Epstein's r

o. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Discovery responses containing bare-boned objections, without more, are stricken as a matter of course. Id. See also Murray Van & Storage, Inc. v. Murray, 343 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) (stating that an objection to discovery claiming that the sought-after information is not reasonably c

HE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES THERETO Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffr

RIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES THERETO Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rules 1.280 and 1.380 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby requests that this

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

tion with Edwards's prosecution of cases against Mr. Epstein before and after Edwards joined RRA. Epstein's r

o. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Discovery responses containing bare-boned objections, without more, are stricken as a matter of course. Id. See also Murray Van & Storage, Inc. v. Murray, 343 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) (stating that an objection to discovery claiming that the sought-after information is not reasonably c

HE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES THERETO Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffr

RIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES THERETO Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rules 1.280 and 1.380 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby requests that this

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

tion with Edwards's prosecution of cases against Mr. Epstein before and after Edwards joined RRA. Epstein's r

o. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Discovery responses containing bare-boned objections, without more, are stricken as a matter of course. Id. See also Murray Van & Storage, Inc. v. Murray, 343 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) (stating that an objection to discovery claiming that the sought-after information is not reasonably c

F THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: CROW PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey

OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files his Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards's ("Edwa

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

nadmissible at trial, if it may lead to the discovery of relevant evidence." Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston, 655 So. 2d 91, 93 (Fla. 1995). See also Murray Van & Storage, Inc. v. Murray, 343 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) (stating that an objection to discovery claiming that the sought-after information is not reasonably c