4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
13 / 4
Mentions
From: Jeffrey E stein <[email protected]> To: Al seckel Subject: Re: Question about your post on business insider Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 06:20:45 +0000 no, not re
ook, the Wall Street Journal, The New York Post - that we assume have been fully fact checked. Unfortunately in this case, Gawker misread the bio on Epstein's site. It was certainly not a deliberate misrepresentation on my part, but rather an honest mistake. Again, I appreciate the heads-up. I also wou
Katya On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Al seckel < > wrote: Hello Katya, I am writing you, because I have been associated in a very loose way on Jeffrey Epstein's new blog. I am a vision scientist/author, and he interviewed me for his blog. However, due to a google alert, I came across your posting on busines
From: Jeffrey E stein <[email protected]> To: Al seckel Su
true , only reporters Sony for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Nov 10, 2010, at 8:08 AM, Al seckel < FYI. ;-) Forwarded Message --- From: Katya Wachtel c To: Al seckel • Sent: Tue, November 9, 2010 9:38:39 PM Subject Re: Question about your post on business insider Dear Mr Seckel, > wrote: Than
Katya On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Al seckel alla wrote: Hello Katya, I am writing you, because I have been associated in a very loose way on Jeffrey Epstein's new blog. I am a vision scientist/author, and he interviewed me for his blog. However, due to a google alert, I came across your posting on busines
ook, the Wall Street Journal, The New York Post - that we assume have been fully fact checked. Unfortunately in this case, Gawker misread the bio on Epstein's site. It was certainly not a deliberate misrepresentation on my part, but rather an honest mistake. Again, I appreciate the heads-up. I also wou
own fact checking? Did you deliberately misrepresent? Or, was this an honest mistake. In any case, I think you should change your post, as if I were Jeffrey (and I definitely am not!) I would sue you for libel. In today's age of information, or should we say misinformation and disinformation, it would be
mail.com> Subject: Fw: Question about your post on business insider Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 06:08:26 +0000 FYI. ;-) Forwarded Message ---- From: Katya Wachtel < To: Al seckel < Sent: Tue, November 9, 2010 9:38:39 PM Subject: Re: Question about your post on business insider Dear Mr Seckel, Thank you for
Katya On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Al seckel alla wrote: Hello Katya, I am writing you, because I have been associated in a very loose way on Jeffrey Epstein's new blog. I am a vision scientist/author, and he interviewed me for his blog. However, due to a google alert, I came across your posting on busines
ook, the Wall Street Journal, The New York Post - that we assume have been fully fact checked. Unfortunately in this case, Gawker misread the bio on Epstein's site. It was certainly not a deliberate misrepresentation on my part, but rather an honest mistake. Again, I appreciate the heads-up. I also wou
21:38 +0000 Don't understand your remark. From: Jeffrey E stein < [email protected]> To: Al seckel < >
true , only reporters Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Nov 10, 2010, at 8:08 AM, Al seckel FYI. ;-) Forwarded Message ---- From: Katya Wachtel < To: Al seckel < > wrote: EFTA00752831 Sent Tue, November 9, 2010 9:38:39 PM Subject Re: Question about your post on business insider Dear Mr
To: Jeffrey [email protected]] From: Al seckel Sent: Wed 11/10/2010 6:27:04 AM Subject: Re: Question about your post on business insider Former
el <[email protected]> wrote: Hello Katya, EFTA_R1_01478522 EFTA02415220 I am writing you, because I have been associated in a very loose way on Jeffrey Epstein's new blog. I am a vision scientist/author, and he interviewed me for his blog. However, due to a google alert, I came across your posting on busines
ok, the Wall Street Journal, The New York Post - that we assume have been fully fact checked. Unfortunately in this case, Gawkcr misread the bio on Epstein's site. It was certainly not a deliberate misrepresentation on my part, but rather an honest mistake. Again, I appreciate the heads-up. I also wou
y for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone On Nov 10, 2010, at 8:08 AM, Al seckel <aseckelayahoo.com> wrote: FYI. ;-) Forwarded Message ---- From: Katya Wachtel <[email protected]> To: Al seckel <aseckelftyahoo.com> Sent: Tue, November 9, 2010 9:38:39 PM Subject: Re: Question about your post on bu
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Katya Wachtel