Epstein Secrets

e Central Ohio Amount S 39,611,905 Policy No. PCG 0021940015 Date of Exp. July I 5th, 2018 BY YOUR POLICY OF INSURANCE ABOVE DESCRIBED, YOU INSURED Jeffrey Epstein according to the terms and conditions therein, the below mentioned property against loss from the following cases: Property Insured as Per Policy

F INSURANCE ABOVE DESCRIBED, YOU INSURED Jeffrey Epstein according to the terms and conditions therein, t

POLICY OF INSURANCE ABOVE DESCRIBED, YOU INSURED Jeffrey Epstein according to the terms and conditions th

h and all claims and demands against any person, persons, corporation or property, arising from or connected with such loss or damage, (and the said Insurers is subrogated in the place of and to the claims and demands of the undersigned against said person, persons, corporation or property in the premises

ce Central Ohio Amount S 39,611,905 Policy No. PCG 0021940015 Date of Exp. July 15th, 2018 BY YOUR POLICY OF INSURANCE ABOVE DESCRIBED, YOU INSURED Jeffrey Epstein according to the terms and conditions therein, the below mentioned property against loss from the following cases: Property Insured as Per Policy t

F INSURANCE ABOVE DESCRIBED, YOU INSURED Jeffrey Epstein according to the terms and conditions therein, t

POLICY OF INSURANCE ABOVE DESCRIBED, YOU INSURED Jeffrey Epstein according to the terms and conditions th

, ereby assi and transfer to the said urers each and all claims and demands against cruf" ; ' a c-1 4" Al-al.-r- 41.-e- Lane. , (and the said Insurers is subrogated in the place of vier , -fl ri ..5 . 'L. ° Ilert_Liaras and to the claims and demands of the undersigned ag inst said person, person

136], the Razorback Victims' Motion for Clarification or, Alternatively, Motion Altering or Amending Order Granting the Motions of the Trustee and Jeffrey Epstein to Issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum [DE 137], the Trustee's Response [DE 138], Edward J. Morse's Response [DE 139/140], Morse Operati

motion to depose Rothstein was granted by this Court. The Razorback Victims contend that they are "at the heart" of the Ponzi scheme as compared to Epstein. However, there are some important distinctions between Epstein and the Razorback Victims. First, Epstein's state court action against Rothstein an

ng Order Granting the Motions of the Trustee and Jeffrey Epstein to Issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Test

owed to participate. However, because the Razorback victims already participated, the Court will grant them access to the deposition to observe the Insurers' questioning of Rothstein, but absent a demonstration of specific need, the Razorback victims will not be allowed to further question Rothstein. T