Epstein Secrets

From: Joichi Ito To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: $1M rain contract Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:18:00 +0000 Hmm... I was just trying to sketch that it was comple

below in case you have time to read the current draft. Thinking of posting this today. Hopefully it's not stupid. ;-) On Apr 25, 2016, at 10:12 AM, Jeffrey E. [email protected]> wrote: more complicated, value for book purposes value to a buyer. value to a buyer if cloudy weather day before. etc On Mo

From: Joichi Ito To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: $1M rain co

From: Joichi Ito To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: $1M

ins. Reinventing Bookkeeping and Accounting (In Search of Certainty) Joichi Ito Current plan is to publish on Monday April 24.2016 Original is on PubPub. EFTA00828727 Double-entry bookkeeping was deployed in its modern form in the 1300s, and while minor innovations have occurred since then, the fu

Hi Joi: From: Joi Ito To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: for Jeffrey to send to Mort Zuckerman Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:52:35 +0000 Attachments: MIT_Media_Lab--Zuck

Hi Joi: From: Joi Ito To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: for Jeffrey to send to Mort Zuckerman Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:52:35 +0000 Attachments: MIT_Media_Lab--Zuckerman--Januaty_2016.docx I don't know if this is a

Hi Joi: From: Joi Ito To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: for Jeffre

frey is still interested in sending Mort Zuckerman a short $10 million proposal, one is attached. I've drawn heavily on your and Neri's articles for PubPub. We are asking for a chair in antidisciplinary science and seed money to launch Design-Science. Please copy me if you send it. I can also make chan

below in case you have time to read the current draft. Thinking of posting this today. Hopefully it's not stupid. ;-) On Apr 25, 2016, at 10:12 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: more complicated, value for book purposes value to a buyer. value to a buyer if cloudy weather day before. etc On Mon

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Joichi Ito czi

ns. Reinventing Bookkeeping and Accounting (In Search of Certainty) Joichi Ito Current plan is to publish on Monday April 24. 2016 Original is on PubPub. EFTA00828735 Double-entry bookkeeping was deployed in its modern form in the 1300s, and while minor innovations have occurred since then, the fu

f the instrument at that time? Aren't they suggesting that they should be marked down to zero if there is no market? On Apr 25, 2016, at 10:37 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: think of it like insurance values, a life policy, On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Joichi Ito < wrote: Hmm... I was

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Joichi Ito Subje

Bookkeeping and Accounting (In Search of Certainty) EFTA00828747 Joichi Ito Current plan is to publish on Monday April 24, 2016 Original is on PubPub. Double-entry bookkeeping was deployed in its modern form in the 1300s, and while minor innovations have occurred since then, the fundamental atomi

uld be concerned about liquidity, it might be valued at zero even though it clearly isn't for other purposes"? - Joi On Apr 25, 2016, at 11:05 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: sec rules vs accounting rules vs gapp accounting vs tax accounting vs common sense. . if i own all of manhattan, it ca

here is no market? On Apr 25, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: think of it li

s. Reinventing Bookkeeping and Accounting (In Search of Certainty) Joichi Ito Current plan is to publish on Monday April 24, 2016 Original is on PubPub. Double-entry bookkeeping was deployed in its modern form in the 1300s, and while minor innovations have occurred since then, the fundamental atomi