Epstein Secrets

"Sweetheart deal!" So goes the attack on the resolution of the more than a decade ago federal investigation involving our client Jeffrey Epstein. The attack is profoundly misplaced, supported neither by the law nor the facts. Moreover, it is inaccurately leveled at President Trump's curren

of Labor, Alex Acosta, who was then the United States Attorney in south Florida. In actuality, the disposition of a federal criminal case against Jeffrey in the form of a Non- Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") was negotiated on both sides at arms-length between several prosecutors in the United States A

d, as well as what actually transpired during those negotiations. Equally as inaccurate is the continued irresponsible mischaracterization of Mr. Epstein's case as a trafficking case. The true facts of Mr. Epstein's case bear no resemblance to that distorted and exaggerated narrative. Despite repeat

's case as a trafficking case. The true facts of Mr. Epstein's case bear no resemblance to that distorted and

prosecutors in Palm Beach County. Nevertheless, without any request from or consultation with those prosecutors, the federal government intervened. The United States Attorneys Office extensively and aggressively investigated whether Mr. Epstein had engaged in a commercial human trafficking ring, targeted minors, or used the inter

Dear Alex: Consistent with Mr. Epstein's continued exercise of his best efforts to maintain full compliance with the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, we write to inform you of new

Dear Alex: Consistent with Mr. Epstein's continued exercise of his best efforts to main

urs per week. Yet those terms, which were within the purview of the Sheriff's Office, were accepted and served by Mr. Epstein without complaint 2. The United States Attorneys Office the very next day after the Mr Epstein began serving his sentence notified the sheriff that they acknowledged that the conditions of custody were i

Dear Alex: Consistent with Mr Epstein's commitment to maintain full compliance with the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, we write to inform you of new information we have just re

ce with respect to inmates similarly situated to Mr. Epstein, the Sheriffs Office has informed Mr. Epstein of

rtainly, the United States Attorney's Office made no objection to the manner in which the Sheriffs Office administered Mr. Epstein's sentence. 2. The United States Attorneys Office has already agreed that under the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, Mr. Epstein was eligible to participate in the Sheriffs alternative custo

Dear Alex: Consistent with Mr. Epstein's continued exercise of his best efforts to maintain full compliance with the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, we write to inform you of new

Dear Alex: Consistent with Mr. Epstein's continued exercise of his best efforts to main

ours per week. Yet those terms, which were within the purview of the Sheriffs Office, were accepted and served by Mr. Epstein without complaint 2. The United States Attorneys Office the very next day after the Mr Epstein began serving his sentence notified the sheriff that they acknowledged that the conditions of custody were i

Dear Alex: Consistent with Mr Epstein's commitment to maintain full compliance with the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, we write to inform you of new information we have just re

ce with respect to inmates similarly situated to Mr. Epstein, the Sheriff's Office has informed Mr. Epstein o

tainly, the United States Attorney's Office made no objection to the manner in which the Sheriff's Office administered Mr. Epstein's sentence. 2. The United States Attorneys Office has already agreed that under the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, Mr. Epstein was eligible to participate in the Sheriffs alternative custo

Dear Alex: Consistent with Mr. Epstein's continued exercise of his best efforts to maintain full compliance with the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, we write to inform you of new

Dear Alex: Consistent with Mr. Epstein's continued exercise of his best efforts to main

ours per week. Yet those terms, which were within the purview of the Sheriffs Office, were accepted and served by Mr. Epstein without complaint 2. The United States Attorneys Office had from the very next day after the Mr Epstein began serving his sentence notified the sheriff that they axknowledged that the conditions of custo