Epstein Secrets

lialonancto aoiaaans 9698922 : fiq VIOS EFTA00307083 FOR PUBLICATION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN JEFFREY EPSTEIN and L.S.J., LLC., v. FANCELLI PANELING, INC., Plaintiffs, Defendant. DENISE FRANCOIS, ESQ. Hodge & Francois 1340 Taameberg St. Thomas, U.S. V

2 is the sole member of Plaintiff L.S.J., LLC. L.S.J.3 owns Little St. James, which is an island off of the southeast coast of St. Thomas. In 2005, Epstein contracted with non-parties—J.P. Molyneux Studio, Ltd., and Juan Pablo Molyneux (collectively, "Molyneux")—to design a residential project on Little

Renaissance exchanged phone calls, faxes and emalls with s in :Bd e8S:00 TT -1.2-90 HU373/120103 aolHudns 0690912 : fiq Was xed EFTA00307088 Jetey Epstein v. Fancelli Paneling Inc. Civil No. ST-10-CV-443 Memorandum Opinion Page 6 of II foreign corporation engages in reciprocal communications with a

GIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN JEFFREY EPSTEIN and L.S.J., LLC., v. FANCELLI PANELING,

Islands courts in the absence of a local law to the contrary). A necessary party, however, only becomes indispensible when it cannot be joined. FED. R. Clv. P. 19(b). There is flo reason provided by Fancelli that Molyneux cannot be joined. 81/6 :Scl e6S:89 TT —LZ xualonanoo Homans 8698922 6q lugs x

Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2009 Page 2 of 22 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.:

, which has been consolidated for purposes of discovery, Plaintiffs are former under-age girls who allege they were sexually assaulted by Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), at his Palm Beach mansion home. The scheme is alleged to have taken place over the course of several years in or around 2004-2005, when

nsolidated for purposes of discovery, Plaintiffs are former under-age girls who allege they were sexually assaulted by Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), at his Palm Beach mansion home. The scheme is alleged to have taken place over the course of several years in or around 2004-2005, when the girls

n, the party resisting discovery must demonstrate specifically how the objected-to request is unreasonable or otherwise unduly burdensome. See Fed. R. Clv. P. 33(b)(4); Panola Land Buyers Ass'n v. Shuman, 762 F.2d 1550, 1559 (11th Cir. 1985); Rossbach 128 F.Supp.2d at 1353. Thus, to even merit conside

rk MOM Plaintiff v. Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant Civil Action No. 15-CV-07433-R1NS SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION IN A CIVIL ACTION To: JEFFREY EPSTEIN New 73;” at WV; zi :y;;;;.; f Ter I imony: YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at the time, date, and place set forth below to testify at a deposition

Y AT A DEPOSITION IN A CIVIL ACTION To: JEFFREY EPSTEIN New 73;” at WV; zi :y;;;;.; f Ter I imony: Y

O TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION IN A CIVIL ACTION To: JEFFREY EPSTEIN New 73;” at WV; zi :y;;;;.; f Ter I

n 3 Civil Action (Page 2) Civil Action No. 15-CV47433-RWS PROOF OF SERVICE (This section should not bellied with the court unless required by Fed. R. Clv. P. 45.) on (dole) received this subpoena for (name of individual and title, 'any) 0 I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named indiv