Epstein Secrets

-erifieitl-distirtetion-between-the-Fleridit-seature-te whieh-Mfr E-peteiri-pleeelerl-guitty-arki-the-Neve-Yerk-eegaater it-is-riet-even-elear-that-Mfr Epstein committed an offense which is registerable under Ncw York law. While the Florida law critninalistes-parronithig-a-prostitute-who-is-uridethe-itge-el

spite his Florida conviction and the conduct alleged in connection therewith. See Letter of Regina Chacon, New Mexico Department of Public Safety to Jeffery E. Epstein, August 19, 2010 (Exhibit E); see also NMSA 1978, § 29-11A-3(E). Notwithstanding the Sstate's determination that he need not register, Mr. Epstein v

onviction for a prostitution-related offense, committed in Florida (wherehe-alse-ewris-a-vaeatien-heine)-dating back to 2005. On June 30, 2008, Mr. Epstein pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Florida under an Information to the charge of Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostituti

indeed, by the terms of the SORA statute itself, should not be required to register. See Correction Law § 168-a(2)(a)(i).7 Indeed, nothing about Mr. Jeffrey-Epstein's interactions with A.D. -- other than A.D.'s age, which she concealed from him and has not been established to be under the age of consent under New

October 7, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 3

October 7, 2010 SUBJECT: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30

en-heine)-dating back to 2005. On June 30, 2008, Mr. Epstein pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court for Palm Beac

ld needlessly duplicate -- and indeed, unnecessarily go well beyond -- the efforts of jurisdictions having much greater contact with and control over Jeffrer . Mr. Epstein. In addition, designating Jeffrey Mr. Epstein as a Level 3 offender would require him to return to New York to re-register every 90

e all of the restrictions imposed on him and completed his incarceration and probation without incident. Perhaps more significantly, Florida -- the Sstate where Jeffrey Epstein was actually convicted of the prostitution offense that obligated him, when he was full—time resident of that State. -to regi

egistratien-available-baseel-en a-Fisk-assessmentr and effender,The-sexuel-pretlatec-itlesignatien-is-ebyieusly-the-iftere-setious-elassifteatien, MfrEpsteinr based-en-the-effense-en-whielthistuilir plett-was-enteredaetas-elassifted-as-a sexual-effenerr Plocilials-lowest-level-ef-sexual-registfatienr In-f

SECOND DRAFT August 2010 New York State Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders 4 Tower Place Albany, New York 12203-3764 Re: Jeffrey Epstein NYSID # OS1909 Dear This letter and the accompanying materials are submitted to the Board pursuant to its notice of August 2, 2010, concerning th

r,Ifl-NtkEpsteinls-e-aser he-is-requirgel-te-repeft-at-the-lowest two-times-rier--year=Aeeeritlinglyr untler-the-Florida-registration-sehetner Mr: Epsteinls-r-egistr-atiog—r-equireeents—are—at—the—lewest—leyel—fer--a—pecsen—for--whom registration-is-r-equireEIT Letter of Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., Ex. .

4 Tower Place Albany, New York 12203-3764 Re: Jeffrey Epstein NYSID # OS1909 Dear This letter and th

is to demonstrate to the Board that, based upon Mr. Epstein's history and personal characteristics, the circu

Underlying the Offense Trieeering the Florida Registration Rea uirement The offense which required Mr. Epstein to register as a sex offender in the Sstate of Florida was a violation of Fla. Stat. §796.03, which criminalizes procuring a person under the age of 18 (the age of consent in€ Florida) for pr

aaionsrand inisr-epresentatie any-instanee-that-directly contradicted in many cases bys the written records As to each and every allegation that Mr Epstein has "breached" his obligations under the NPA IN-eaeh-instanee-whereyetehave-suggested-a-breaeh in-the-past I have attached Fthe-releveant correspon

o his counsel nor true . Is-just-net-truerWe-ean-deeument-thist ifyou-se preferJACK - DOCUMENT REBUTTAL IF WE CAN - IT'S A MATTER OF CREDIBILITY OF JE . There was nothing out of the oridinary , he was treated like any other inmate, and if any different at all, it was he was kept in jail longer tha

rights under the NPA and thus Kirkland and Ellis believes today that the Motion to Dismiss was well grounded. It was withdrawn at the insistence of Mr Epstein who prioritizes his desire to avoid contentious additional litigation with the USAO over whatever civil litigation advantages he got derive from the

eipt from the State. i.e. had-only one-week-to-pleadr wWe sent the state plea to you , as soon as we received it. It had only been prepared by the Sstate Attorney the day before. DOCUMENT THIS. The State Attorney not Mr Epstein's state lawyers drafted the plea agreement and EFTA00727507 following d