Epstein Secrets

10B New York, New York 10065 Telephone: Telecopier: email: Mr. Robert Couturier Robert Couturier, Inc. July 14. 2010 New York, NY 10012 Re: Jeffrey Epstein and Re-Design of Residence on Little St. James Island Dear Mr. Couturier: I have reviewed Richard Kahn's email dated June 23, 2010 to Sally Ann Ca

Ann Calabrese of your firm and Ms. Calabrese's response dated June 24, 2010. There is simply no legal justification for your refusal to refund Mr. Epstein's full $50,000 deposit, and your claim for more than $41,000 of additional charges is preposterous. Your sudden departure from the project at its i

er, Inc. July 14. 2010 New York, NY 10012 Re: Jeffrey Epstein and Re-Design of Residence on Little St.

no legal justification for your refusal to refund Mr. Epstein's full $50,000 deposit, and your claim for more

n Little St. James Island Dear Mr. Couturier: I have reviewed Richard Kahn's email dated June 23, 2010 to Sally Ann Calabrese of your firm and Ms. Calabrese's response dated June 24, 2010. There is simply no legal justification for your refusal to refund Mr. Epstein's full $50,000 deposit, and your clai

rk 10065 Telecopier: (212) 517-7779 email: July 14. 2010 Mr. Robert Couturier Robert Couturier, Inc. 69 Mercer Street New York, NY 10012 Re: Jeffrey Epstein and Re-Design of Residence on Little St. James Island Dear Mr. Couturier: I have reviewed Richard Kahn's email dated June 23, 2010 to Sally Ann Ca

Ann Calabrese of your firm and Ms. Calabrese's response dated June 24, 2010. There is simply no legal justification for your refusal to refund Mr. Epstein's full $50,000 deposit, and your claim for more than $41,000 of additional charges is preposterous. Your sudden departure from the project at its i

Inc. 69 Mercer Street New York, NY 10012 Re: Jeffrey Epstein and Re-Design of Residence on Little St.

no legal justification for your refusal to refund Mr. Epstein's full $50,000 deposit, and your claim for more

n Little St. James Island Dear Mr. Couturier: I have reviewed Richard Kahn's email dated June 23, 2010 to Sally Ann Calabrese of your firm and Ms. Calabrese's response dated June 24, 2010. There is simply no legal justification for your refusal to refund Mr. Epstein's full $50,000 deposit, and your clai

k, New York 10065 e ecopier: Sri-rr, email: July 13. 2010 Mr. Robert Couturier Robert Couturier, Inc. 69 Mercer Street New York, NY 10012 Re: Jeffrey Epstein and Re-Design of Residence on Little St. James Island Dear Mr. Couturier: I have reviewed Richard Kahn's email dated June 23, 2010 to Sally Ann Ca

Ann Calabrese of your firm and Ms. Calabrese's response dated June 24, 2010. There is simply no legal justification for your refusal to refund Mr. Epstein's full $50,000 deposit, and your claim for more than $41,000 of additional charges is preposterous. Your sudden departure from the project at its i

Inc. 69 Mercer Street New York, NY 10012 Re: Jeffrey Epstein and Re-Design of Residence on Little St.

no legal justification for your refusal to refund Mr. Epstein's full $50,000 deposit, and your claim for more

n Little St. James Island Dear Mr. Couturier: I have reviewed Richard Kahn's email dated June 23, 2010 to Sally Ann Calabrese of your firm and Ms. Calabrese's response dated June 24, 2010. There is simply no legal justification for your refusal to refund Mr. Epstein's full $50,000 deposit, and your clai

010 VIA EMAIL David A. Berger, Esq. Allegaert Berger and Vogel LLP 111 Broadway, 20th Floor New York, NY 10006 Re: Robert Couturier. Inc. adv. Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Berger: I have received your letter dated July 26, 2010 and disagree with your analysis entirely. As you concede in your letter, Mr. Eps

ein Dear Mr. Berger: I have received your letter dated July 26, 2010 and disagree with your analysis entirely. As you concede in your letter, Mr. Epstein advanced $50,000 to Mr. Couturier's firm, Robert Couturier, Inc. ("RCI"), of which $25,000 was to be credited against future fees. As Ms. Calabrese

York, NY 10006 Re: Robert Couturier. Inc. adv. Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Berger: I have received your l

nalysis entirely. As you concede in your letter, Mr. Epstein advanced $50,000 to Mr. Couturier's firm, Robert

. Epstein advanced $50,000 to Mr. Couturier's firm, Robert Couturier, Inc. ("RCI"), of which $25,000 was to be credited against future fees. As Ms. Calabrese acknowledged in her email to Mr. Kahn dated June 24, 2010, that $25,000 has been deemed by RCI to have been "credited back" to Mr. Epstein, as no f