Epstein Secrets

0 and RICE PUGATCH ROBINSON STORFER & COHEN. by 10 of his obvious concern about the allegations in the II CHAD P. PUGATCH. Esquire On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein 11 motion. 12 12 MR. PUGATCH: Good afternoon, your Honor. 13 CARLTON FIELDS. BY NIALL SKLAUCHLAN. Esquire 13 Chad Pugatch, P-u-g-a-t-c-h, her

tive intervenors. For that reason I think the motion 23 should be denied as to E.W. and Jane Doe. 24 MR. PUGATCH: Your Honor, on behalf of 25 Mr. Epstein, we would join in that objection, that limited Page 6 THE CLERK: Okay. 2 ECRO: Do you want me to print you a 3 calendar that shows his name? 4

n the II CHAD P. PUGATCH. Esquire On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein 11 motion. 12 12 MR. PUGATCH: Good af

e. 24 MR. PUGATCH: Your Honor, on behalf of 25 Mr. Epstein, we would join in that objection, that limited P

OUELLETTE & MA LDIN RT REPORTERS, INC. EFTA00787710 Page 29 Page 31 1 provisions of Title 11. I order. That is by definition in the In Re: McClean case, 2 Courts have held, and we've cited them in 2 and countless other 11th Circuit cases, and lower court 3 our motion, that Bankruptcy Courts

RSON, Esquire On behalf of Farmer Jaffe SCOTT LINK, Esquire and RICE PUGATCH ROBINSON STORFER & COHEN, by CHAD P. PUGATCH, Esquire On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein CARLTON FIELDS, BY NIALL McLAUCHLAN, Esquire JOSEPH IANNO, Esquire On behalf of Fowler White AKERMAN, LLP, by JOAN LEVIT, Esquire On behalf of

hree putative intervenors. For that reason I think the motion should be denied as to E.W. and Jane Doe. MR. PUGATCH: Your Honor, on behalf of Mr. Epstein, we would join in that objection, that limited OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, INC. EFTA00787723 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

COHEN, by CHAD P. PUGATCH, Esquire On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein CARLTON FIELDS, BY NIALL McLAUCHLAN, Es

Jane Doe. MR. PUGATCH: Your Honor, on behalf of Mr. Epstein, we would join in that objection, that limited O

laid out, I don't think there could ever be a basis for it, but this also gets to the discovery point, and even though the 11th Circuit in In Re: McClean, they affirm a finding of punitive damages, which are by definition criminal, because it's punishment, as opposed to purely compensatory damages,

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 6, 2016 3:20 PM To: Daphne Wallace Subject: Re: Great St. James - Cistern - Pre Final Drawings ok On

hne Wallace Subject: Re: Great St. James - Cistern - Pre Final Drawings ok On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Daphne Wallace wrote: Greetings Mr. Epstein, Mr. McClean will require=about $150 for maps from the Cadastral office as part of the permit filing=for the Cistern project. Is it okay to procee

16 at 11:17 AM, Daphne Wallace wrote: Greetings Mr. Epstein, Mr. McClean will require=about $150 for maps fr

ubject: Re: Great St. James - Cistern - Pre Final Drawings ok On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Daphne Wallace wrote: Greetings Mr. Epstein, Mr. McClean will require=about $150 for maps from the Cadastral office as part of the permit filing=for the Cistern project. Is it okay to proceed?</=iv> Resp

enforce 28:23,25 29:16 29:18 entered 12:15 13:13 25:11,16 26:2 entire 46:14 entirely 28:6,8 entitled 27:18 Entry 24:23 41:24 envelope 22:11 Epstein 2:114:14 7:25 8:8,25 10:14 12:43 12:17 13:10 15:15 17:1,8,13,16 18:2,5 18:17,24,25 19:12,14 19:17 22:1,2425:3 27:3 30:6 33:10,13,20 33:21 34:1

35:19 37:3,8 41:17,25 la 's 25:16 32:17 2:19 7:8,16,23 8:4 9:2 OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS. INC. (305) 358-8875 EFTA00810878 Page 4 Jeffrey 2:11 4:14 15:15 17:8 37:9 40:12 Jeffry 37:6 Jenkins 1:23 50:8,19 Joan 2:16 4:20 join 6:22 7:25 17:24 41:24 joinder 5:10,11 47:14 joined 3:16

0 16:21 18:2025:17,17 27:7 33:9 38:18,18,20 38:20,22,22 42:15,18 43:12 45:7 47:9,19 48:9,13 maybe 23:3 24:2 27:9 38:23 42:15 ma'am 4:18 6:21 McClean 29:8,22 31:1 McLACHLAN 24:11 24:12,25 25:9 McLAUCHLAN 2:13 4:6,7 7:14 8:22 10:21 10:25 11:9 25:6 mean 39:7 40:10 42:19 means 32:18 meant 24:1