Epstein Secrets

ict Attorney, Sex Crimes Unit / Trial Bureau 40 New York District Attorneys Office One Hogan Place New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYS1D # OS1909, Supreme Court Case # 30129-2010 Dear ADA Gaffney and ADA Egan: As you know, we represent Jeffrey E. Epstein, who is scheduled to

ieve expose the stark contrast between the inflammatory, speculative case summary presented by the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning the alleged conduct for which New York seeks to require Mr. Epstein to register under SORA. We beli

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYS1D # OS1909, Supreme Court Case # 3

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYS1D # OS1909, Supreme Court Case # 30

the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning

York, the three measures which determine whether someone needs to register under SORA. See N.Y. Correction Law § 168-a(14), (15), § 168-k. Indeed, the New York State Department of Taxation has not recognized Mr. Epstein as a domiciliary of New York since 1992, despite the fact that he has maintained a vacation home in New York since t

ct Attorney, Sex Crimes Unit / Trial Bureau 40 New York District Attorney's Office One Hogan Place New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case #30129-2010 Dear ADA Gaffney and ADA Egan: As you know, we represent Jeffrey E. Epstein, who is scheduled to a

ieve expose the stark contrast between the inflammatory, speculative case summary presented by the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning the alleged conduct for which New York seeks to require Mr. Epstein to register under SORA. We hope

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case #30

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case #301

the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning

New York, the three measures which determine whether someone needs to register under SORA. See Corrections Law § 168-a(14), (15), § 168-k. Indeed, the New York State Department of Taxation has not recognized Mr. Epstein as a domiciliary of New York since 1992, despite the fact that he has owned a vacation home in New York since that t

ct Attorney, Sex Crimes Unit / Trial Bureau 40 New York District Attorney's Office One Hogan Place New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case #30129-2010 Dear ADA Gaffney and ADA Egan: As you know, we represent Jeffrey E. Epstein, who is scheduled to a

keep track of specifically when different events with Epstein took place). While= could not say with certainty when she first met and massaged Mr. Epstein= stated definitively and unambiguously that she was 17 years old during their single instance of brief sexual intercourse, when she claimed that Mr.

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case #30

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case #301

the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning

New York, the three measures which determine whether someone needs to register under SORA. See Corrections Law § 168-a(14), (15), § 168-k. Indeed, the New York State Department of Taxation has not recognized Mr. Epstein as a domiciliary of New York since 1992, despite the fact that he has maintained a vacation home in New York since t

ct Attorney, Sex Crimes Unit / Trial Bureau 40 New York District Attorney's Office One Hogan Place New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30129-2010 Dear ADA Gaffney and ADA Egan: As you know, we represent Jeffrey E. Epstein, who is scheduled to

ieve expose the stark contrast between the inflammatory, speculative case summary presented by the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning the alleged conduct for which New York seeks to require Mr. Epstein to register under SORA. We hope

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 3

New York, NY 10013 Re: SORA Determination for Jeffrey E. Epstein, NYSID # OSI909, Supreme Court Case # 30

the Board of Examiners in its recommendation for Mr. Epstein, and the actual evidence that exists concerning

New York, the three measures which determine whether someone needs to register under SORA. See Corrections Law § 168-a(14), (15), § 168-k. Indeed, the New York State Department of Taxation has not recognized Mr. Epstein as a domiciliary of New York since 1992, despite the fact that he has evette4maintained a vacation home in New York