Epstein Secrets

says the law 19 which is the disk that i➢ now In the posse➢s1on of 20 fiefs of Fowler mute will print a hard copy of all 20 Jeffrey Epstein and Jaffrey Epstein'➢ counsel. And 21 the document➢ contained on the disks with Bates 21 it contain➢ without a doubt those documents that he 22 numbers added and wi

' Second Supplement to TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS 12 Motion in Lunine Addressing Scope of Admissible I) Evidence, and of course in that same vein Epstein's DATE TAKEN: Thursday, March 8th, 2018 14 Notice of Service of Unredacted Appendix in TIME: 1:30 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. PLACE 205 N. Dixie Highway

tion, and I understand your 6 Honor, that might be helpful? 7 concerns, but what the attorney➢ here recognize -- ? THE COURT: Sure. a and Kr. Epstein la also under this order -- is that • KR. LIKE: We now have, I think, S4 or 36 9 no further di➢➢emination is going to be made. I 9 boxes they deli

37:15 38:6,13 57:4 JAMES 2:12 Jane 2:11 22:18 65:9,20 74:14 Jansen 81:21,25 83:3,11,12,19 85:1 88:19 90:4 91:3 Jansen's 94:7 January 66:17 Jeffrey 1:5 2:15 12:20,20 94:21 job 13:11,1243:19 44:6 59:4 108:16 115:23 Joe 8:1 36:1 89:13 joining 22:20 jointly 80:21 JR 2:9 judge 1:16 9:5,6,7,7

the Elaine V. Williams r) exhibit list of the defendant Epstein. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm B

2 4 1 APPEARANCES: I exhibit list filed by Mr. Epstein on November 16, 2 For Plaintiff/Countor-Defenda

e to no until we put this 24 It Says here, 'Should it be determined that 25 together. B, Hoare'➢ a hearing where Mr. Scarola 2$ Fowler White or Epstein• -- so not only does it go Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00793843 I 41 co Fowler White, but lc goes to Epstein -- and I

who knows? But 2 different if it w➢ shown to me that somehow, some 2 Ile not finding fault with anything you or 3 way the Searcy, Denney firm, Kr. Edwards, Farmer a Hiss ROckonbach or Miss Campbell did. That'➢ not 4 Jaffe -- I was going to say Ron Rothstein, but I 4 the issue. You've done your job

says the law 19 which is the disk that i➢ now In the posse➢s1on of 20 fiefs of Fowler mute will print a hard copy of all 20 Jeffrey Epstein and Jaffrey Epstein'➢ counsel. And 21 the document➢ contained on the disks with Bates 21 it contain➢ without a doubt those documents that he 22 numbers added and wi

' Second Supplement to TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS I2 Motion in Lunine Addressing Scope of Admissible 13 Evidence, and of course in that same vein Epstein's DATE TAKEN: Thursday, March 8th, 2018 )4 Notice of Service of Unredacted Appendix in TIME: 1:30 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. PLACE 205 N. Dixie Highway

37:15 38:6,13 57:4 JAMES 2:12 Jane 2:11 22:18 65:9,20 74:14 Jansen 81:21,25 83:3,11,12,19 85:1 88:19 90:4 91:3 Jansen's 94:7 January 66:17 Jeffrey 1:5 2:15 12:20,20 94:21 job 13:11,1243:19 44:6 59:4 108:16 115:23 Joe 8:1 36:1 89:13 joining 22:20 jointly 80:21 JR 2:9 judge 1:16 9:5,6,7,7

the Elaine V. Williams r3 exhibit list of the defendant Epstein. Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 1665 Palm B

2 4 1 APPEARANCES: I exhibit list filed by Mr. Epstein on November 16, 2 For Plaintiff/Counter-Defenda

e to no until we put this 24 It Says here, 'Should it be determined that 25 together. B, Hoare'➢ a hearing where Mr. Scarola 2$ Fowler White or Epstein• -- so not only does it go Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00793796 I 41 co Fowler White, but lc goes to Epstein -- and I

who knows? But 2 different if it w➢ shown to me that somehow, some 2 Ile not finding fault with anything you or 3 way the Searcy, Denney firm, Kr. Edwards, Farmer a Hiss ROckonbach or Miss Campbell did. That'➢ not 4 Jaffe -- I was going to say Ron Rothstein, but I 4 the issue. You've done your job

5 7 obviously, what may or nay not be asked of 2 Mr. Edwards and Mr. Epstein principally on 3 these cases or these Issues, the global 4 order of the Court would be that those 5 individual claims would not be subject to

at may or nay not be asked of 2 Mr. Edwards and Mr. Epstein principally on 3 these cases or these Issues, t

: I was referring to -- THE COURT: There was misconduct at RRA. MR. SCAROLA: -- Mr. Edwards. THE COURT: Whether there was misconduct on behalf of Kr. Edwards, that is, in fact, still a matter of allegation. MR. SCAROLA: Yes, air. And that's the only misconduct I was referring to. THE COURT: Absolutely