Epstein Secrets

Esq.? How about Mark Fistos, Esq.? Were they all secret co- conspirators who have managed to avoid justice for the past nine years? Justice that only Jeffrey Epstein and his counsel can deliver upon? Does Epstein plan to report his "bombshell" findings to 3 Edwards is somewhat confused as to how Epstein could hav

, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and ■l., individually, Defendants. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE RELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL LIMITED DISCOVERY, EVIDENTIARY HEARING, A

OUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

cause a media circus, taint the jury pool, and prevent the parties to the Malicious Prosecution action from picking a jury as presently scheduled. B. Epstein and His Counsel Have "Jumped the Shark."2 5. In his Notice of Filing Appendix. Epstein, through counsel, includes privileged materials under a sect

ion titled "Edwards' Direct Involvement in Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme." If nothing but consistent, Epstein, through counsel, then sprinkles throughout the Motion for Court to Declare Relevance direct accusations and implicit insinuations that, regardless of whether 2 The idiom "jumping the shark" is a pejorative refer

/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF 30 E-MAILS Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Ep

EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF 30 E-MAILS Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") responds in opposition to Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J

OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT

ion titled 'Edwards' Direct Involvement in Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme.' If nothing but consistent, Epstein, through counsel, then sprinkles throughout the Motion for Court to Declare Relevance direct accusations and implicit insinuations that, regardless of whether Epstein had probable cause to institute or continue h

/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF 30 E-MAILS Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Ep

EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR IN CAMERA INSPECTION OF 30 E-MAILS Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") responds in opposition to Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J

OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT

ion titled 'Edwards' Direct Involvement in Rothstein's Ponzi Scheme.' If nothing but consistent, Epstein, through counsel, then sprinkles throughout the Motion for Court to Declare Relevance direct accusations and implicit insinuations that, regardless of whether Epstein had probable cause to institute or continue h