Epstein Secrets

efendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER AND THE INTERVENORS' JOINDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeff

OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER AND THE INTERVENORS' JOINDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") responds in opposition to Counter- Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") April 3, 2018, Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order', an

Berard Rockenbach (FBN Rachel J. Glasser (FBN Primary: Primary: Primary: Secondary: Secondary: Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jay Epstein 13 EFTA00808684 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, . 2139 Palm Beach

OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT

en into consideration is the appellate rights of Mr. Epstein and how they're going to preserve those rights i

HEARING On March 8, 2018, the parties attended a special set hearing on a number of pending Motions, including Edwards' Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privilege Log. Because the trial was o

en into consideration is the appellate rights of Mr. Epstein and how they're going to preserve those rights i

efendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER AND THE INTERVENORS' JOINDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeff

OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER AND THE INTERVENORS' JOINDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") responds in opposition to Counter- Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") April 3, 2018, Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order', an

Berard Rockenbach Rachel J. Glasser (FBN Primary: Primary: Primary: Secondary: Secondary: FBN Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jay Epstein SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Karen E. Teny David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, M. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard We

OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT

HEARING On March 8, 2018, the parties attended a special set hearing on a number of pending Motions, including Edwards' Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privilege Log. Because the trial was o

Esq.? How about Mark Fistos, Esq.? Were they all secret co- conspirators who have managed to avoid justice for the past nine years? Justice that only Jeffrey Epstein and his counsel can deliver upon? Does Epstein plan to report his "bombshell" findings to 3 Edwards is somewhat confused as to how Epstein could hav

, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and ■l., individually, Defendants. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE RELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NATURE OF DOCUMENTS AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL LIMITED DISCOVERY, EVIDENTIARY HEARING, A

OUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

cause a media circus, taint the jury pool, and prevent the parties to the Malicious Prosecution action from picking a jury as presently scheduled. B. Epstein and His Counsel Have "Jumped the Shark."2 5. In his Notice of Filing Appendix. Epstein, through counsel, includes privileged materials under a sect

er', and in support states as follows: I. Edwards incorporates by reference the timeline and arguments contained in his Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privilege Log, filed on March 5, 2018.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. SUPPLEMENT TO EDWARDS' MO

communications between counsel in this matter regarding the source of the untimely Supplemental Exhibits improperly obtained and publicly filed by Epstein, the undersigned received a hand-delivered communication from counsel for Epstein enclosing "a flash drive which duplicates the disc we located in F

OUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

DWARDS' PRIVILEGE LOG Counter-Plaintiff Edwards, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Supplement to his Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privilege Log, and in support states a