Epstein Secrets

ff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and •I., individually, Defendants. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO ALLOW AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT LIST AND SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO ALLOW AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT LIST Bradley J Edwards ("Edwards"), by and throug

ibit List and Supplement thereto, and as grounds therefor states as follows: Delay. Delay. Delay When the Court peels back the layers of Defendant Epstein's attempt to drastically alter his Exhibit List, it will be left with a rather basic question: How far will the Defendant be permitted to go in his

y. Delay When the Court peels back the layers of Defendant Epstein's attempt to drastically alter his Exhibit List,

OUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

n in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: 1. a list of all pending motions including MOTIONS IN LIMINE and DAUBERT MOTIONS requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (MOTIONS IN LIMINE shall not be heard the day of

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, REPLY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO BRADLEY EDWARDS' MOTION IN LIMINE TO STRIKE THE JUNE 30, 2017 AFFIDAVIT OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AS TO WHICH DISCOVER

to Bradley Edwards' motion, Jeffrey Epstein contends that he "answered all of the questions actually germane to this lawsuit" [emphasis included by Epstein]. Response Pg. 2. "When asked in deposition why he filed suit and upon which facts he based this decision, Epstein answered Edwards' questioning; h

OUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

y. Id. at Pg. 48 Q: And Pm trying to find out, Mr. Epstein, whether you have any evidence whatsoever that M

vidually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, REPLY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO BRADLEY EDWARDS' MOTION IN LIMINE TO STRIKE THE JUNE 30, 2017 AFFIDAVIT OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN AND TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AS TO WHICH DISCOVERY WAS WITHHELD UNDER CLAIMS OF PRIVILEGE Brad

IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., Defendant(s). ORDER RESETTING SPECIALLY SET JURY TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRETRIAL AND MEDIATION P

opies famished via e-mail per attached list. ty, Florida this /--) day EFTA00597397 Fred Haddad, One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG COUNSEL LIST Jack Scarola Es Esquire Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Bouleva

OUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et

n in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: 1. a list of all pending motions. including MOTIONS IN LIMINE and FRYE MOTIONS requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (MOTIONS IN LIMINE and FRYE HEARINGS shall not be h

IRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s) v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L M, individually, Defendant(s). ORDER SPECIALLY SETTING

N AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s) v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually

DIVISION AG CASE NO. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s) v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indi

n in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: I. a list of all pending motions including MOTIONS IN LIMINE and DAUBERT MOTIONS requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (MOTIONS IN LIMINE shall not be heard the day of

IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2009CA040800 XXXX MB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., Defendant(s). ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRETRIAL AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES I. SC

ORIDA CASE NO.: 2009CA040800 XXXX MB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et a

UNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2009CA040800 XXXX MB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et

on in this regard. The Pre-Trial Stipulation shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs: I. a list of all pending motions including MOTIONS IN LIMINE and FRYE MOTIONS requiring action by the Court and the dates those motions are set for hearing (MOTIONS IN LIMINE and FRYE HEARINGS shall not be h