Epstein Secrets

ry appeals 2.00 1,500.00 05/09/18 SJL Work on Response to B. Edwards' Motion for 3.20 2,400.00 Rehearing; follow up on deposition schedule of J. Epstein; communications with D. Indyke and J. Epstein; work on trial strategies; work on Motion re V. Roberts' transcript 05/10/18 RJG Review 4th DCA Ord

Link & Rockenbach, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Suite 930 W • • • • 7 01 Jeffrey Epstein 6100 Red Hook Quarter, B3 St. Thomas, USV 00802 CLIENT: 0002 - Jeffrey Epstein Re: 0001 Bradley Edwards Date Services 05/01/18 TLC Work on M

,875.00 Requested Relief; meet with K. Rockenbach and R. Glasser re same; review hearing transcript, B. Edwards' Motion seeking permission to take J. Epstein's limited deposition and B. Edwards' proposed Order, work on edits to same; follow up with D. Indyke, M. Weinberg and J. Goldberger 05/26/18 SJL Co

Prepare Appendix to Response to B. Edwards' Motion for Rehearing Regarding Appellate Fees 05/14/18 SJL Work on Motion for Rehearing of Denial of Epstein's Motion for Appellate Attorneys' Fees and Costs and Response to Edwards' Motion for Rehearing Regarding Appellate Fees; review B. Edwards' "dama

Beach Lakes Blvd. Suite 930 W • • • • 7 01 Jeffrey Epstein 6100 Red Hook Quarter, B3 St. Thomas, U

,080.00 Dismiss; prepare Notice of Hearing on outstanding Motions 05/24/18 SJL Work on Response to Motion for Sanctions; work on list of pending Motions; review Notice of Hearing for submission to opposing counsel; work on Motion to 5.00 3,750.00 Strike Intervenors' List of Requested Relief; follo

BAG vs. JUDGE: HAFELE SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FILED ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 AND TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE SET BY

ANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FILED ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 AND TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE SET BY COURT Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Motion for an enlargement of time within which to Respond to Motions filed by Defendan

rvice at her office. Likewise, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein resides on an island in the United States Virgin

CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, CASE NO.:

(10) days provided by this Court, and that both Mr. Epstein and one of his counsel are of the Jewish faith a

ember 15, 2017, this Court ordered the parties to file certain Motions by Monday, September 25, 2017, and further ordered that all responses to the Motions filed by opposing counsel on September 25, 2017 be filed by September 28, 2017 (a three-day turnaround). The Court also made repeated reference to t

BAG vs. JUDGE: HAFELE SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FILED ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 AND TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE SET BY

ANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FILED ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 AND TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE SET BY COURT Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Motion for an enlargement of time within which to Respond to Motions filed by Defendan

rvice at her office. Likewise, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein resides on an island in the United States Virgin

CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, CASE NO.:

(10) days provided by this Court, and that both Mr. Epstein and one of his counsel are of the Jewish faith a

ember 15, 2017, this Court ordered the parties to file certain Motions by Monday, September 25, 2017, and further ordered that all responses to the Motions filed by opposing counsel on September 25, 2017 be filed by September 28, 2017 (a three-day turnaround). The Court also made repeated reference to t

CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, CASE NO.:

(10) days provided by this Court, and that both Mr. Epstein and one of his counsel are of the Jewish faith a

BAG vs. JUDGE: HAFELE SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FILED ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 AND TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE SET BY

ANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FILED ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 AND TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE SET BY COURT Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Motion for an enlargement of time within which to Respond to Motions filed by Defendan

rvice at her office. Likewise, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Epstein resides on an island in the United States Virgin

ember 15, 2017, this Court ordered the parties to file certain Motions by Monday, September 25, 2017, and further ordered that all responses to the Motions filed by opposing counsel on September 25, 2017 be filed by September 28, 2017 (a three-day turnaround). The Court also made repeated reference to t

THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY TRIAL JUDGE Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorney and

: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY TRIAL JUDGE Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorney and pursuant to Rule 2.330 of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration and § 38.10 of the Florida St

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

ts that I have 16 reviewed, for example, reflect Mr. Epstein's 17 access to airplanes. See Transcript of Oct

mber 28, 2017'. The reasons for the request for more time were delineated clearly in the Motion, and included the following facts: that many of the Motions were directed at Epstein's assertions of various privileges, including his privilege against self-incrimination, and that due to Hurricane Irma and

to anyone else. The Agreed Order Cancelling Hearing provides, in its entirety: The Motion for Relief From Amended Order (D.E. #1068) and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of All Documents in Response to his Requests filed by Interested Party Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman,

ions" (id. at p. 17) or a finding of criminal contempt "as may be appropriate" and monetary sanctions of $25,000 for each of the intervenors against Epstein for any noncompliance with the order at issue, for which amounts "Epstein [be] permitted to seek reimbursement from any of his attorneys who may ha

E OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY FOWLER WHITE AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT,

in its files, having provided all hard files to Mr. Epstein's current counsel, Scott Link. Movants' Motions

ber 2010 until the filing of the Amended Exhibit List in the state court in March 2018; • An investigation by Fowler White since the filing of the Motions has revealed that there are no images of the allegedly-privileged documents from the CD at issue anywhere on its systems; • In March 2018, Fowler