Epstein Secrets

efendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER AND THE INTERVENORS' JOINDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeff

OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER AND THE INTERVENORS' JOINDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") responds in opposition to Counter- Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") April 3, 2018, Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order', an

Berard Rockenbach (FBN Rachel J. Glasser (FBN Primary: Primary: Primary: Secondary: Secondary: Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jay Epstein 13 EFTA00808684 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, . 2139 Palm Beach

OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT

en into consideration is the appellate rights of Mr. Epstein and how they're going to preserve those rights i

0808676 THE COURT'S MARCH 8. 2018. HEARING On March 8, 2018, the parties attended a special set hearing on a number of pending Motions, including Edwards' Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privile

en into consideration is the appellate rights of Mr. Epstein and how they're going to preserve those rights i

efendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER AND THE INTERVENORS' JOINDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeff

OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER AND THE INTERVENORS' JOINDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") responds in opposition to Counter- Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") April 3, 2018, Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order', an

Berard Rockenbach Rachel J. Glasser (FBN Primary: Primary: Primary: Secondary: Secondary: FBN Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jay Epstein SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Karen E. Teny David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, M. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard We

OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT

nctions. THE COURT'S MARCH 8, 2018. HEARING On March 8, 2018, the parties attended a special set hearing on a number of pending Motions, including Edwards' Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privile

RDS' SUMMARY OF DAMAGES Bradley J. Edwards, by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to the Court's Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt and Scheduling Evidentiary Show Cause Hearing, hereby files this Summary of Damages, and states as follows: INTRODU

wler White, are required to show cause as to why they should be not be held in contempt of Court. The evidentiary hearing concerns Fowler White and Epstein's apparent violation of this Court's order dated November 30, 2010 [DE 1194], which governed the process by which approximately 27,000 documents, p

Court's Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt and Sched

counsel and numerous pleadings were filed on these late-disclosed, privileged, and improperly retained communications, including but not limited to Edwards' Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Contained Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privileg

aintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and individually, Defendants. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS TO IDENTIFY BATES NUMBERS OF DOCUMENTS PRODUCED Bradley J Edwards ("Edwards"), by and throug

d thereto, and as grounds therefor states as follows: In 2012, Edwards filed his privilege log in the underlying lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") against Edwards, Scott Rothstein, and victim ■. Although Epstein made some effort to challenge the privilege log in early 2012, he (through his pr

OUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

o list as exhibits the week before the parties' March 13, 2018 trial date. Those documents are identified in the chart below, which was included in Edwards' Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privile