Epstein Secrets

HE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES THERETO Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffr

RIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES THERETO Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rules 1.280 and 1.380 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby requests that this

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

tion with Edwards's prosecution of cases against Mr. Epstein before and after Edwards joined RRA. Epstein's r

Epstein was aware of this when Epstein filed suit against him. However, the allegations made by the Federal Government and the attorneys who filed the Razorback Complaint, the expenditures on improper pleadings, discovery and motion practice by Edwards in the cases he was litigating against Epstein while a Partner at

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, et al., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs. No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE HAFELE MOTION F

unter Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards' malicious prosecution claim fails as a matter of law on an essential element: the absence of probable cause for Epstein's underlying lawsuit. The Court has yet to hear argument from the parties on the issue of probable cause. Oral argument is therefore respectfully r

e of these potentially explosive facts, putative defendant Epstein had allegedly offered $200,000,000.00 for settle

IRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. BRADL

al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereinafter referenced as the "Razorback Complaint"), on behalf of some of the Ponzi Scheme investors. Upon reviewing the Razorback Complaint, I learned that the Razorback Complaint detailed the use of the Epstein Cases (i.e., the cases being litigated against me by Edwards) to defraud in

HE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES THERETO Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffr

RIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES THERETO Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rules 1.280 and 1.380 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby requests that this

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

tion with Edwards's prosecution of cases against Mr. Epstein before and after Edwards joined RRA. Epstein's r

Epstein was aware of this when Epstein filed suit against him. However, the allegations made by the Federal Government and the attorneys who filed the Razorback Complaint, the expenditures on improper pleadings, discovery and motion practice by Edwards in the cases he was litigating against Epstein while a Partner at

HE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES THERETO Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffr

RIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL RESPONSES THERETO Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rules 1.280 and 1.380 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby requests that this

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

tion with Edwards's prosecution of cases against Mr. Epstein before and after Edwards joined RRA. Epstein's r

hat Epstein was aware of this when Epstein filed suit against him. However, the allegations made by the Federal Government, the attorneys who filed the Razorback Complaint, the expenditures on improper pleadings, discovery and motion practice by Edwards in the cases he was litigating against Epstein while a Partner at