Epstein Secrets

0 and RICE PUGATCH ROBINSON STORFER & COHEN. by 10 of his obvious concern about the allegations in the II CHAD P. PUGATCH. Esquire On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein 11 motion. 12 12 MR. PUGATCH: Good afternoon, your Honor. 13 CARLTON FIELDS. BY NIALL SKLAUCHLAN. Esquire 13 Chad Pugatch, P-u-g-a-t-c-h, her

tive intervenors. For that reason I think the motion 23 should be denied as to E.W. and Jane Doe. 24 MR. PUGATCH: Your Honor, on behalf of 25 Mr. Epstein, we would join in that objection, that limited Page 6 THE CLERK: Okay. 2 ECRO: Do you want me to print you a 3 calendar that shows his name? 4

n the II CHAD P. PUGATCH. Esquire On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein 11 motion. 12 12 MR. PUGATCH: Good af

e. 24 MR. PUGATCH: Your Honor, on behalf of 25 Mr. Epstein, we would join in that objection, that limited P

ge 5 Excuse me, Judge. 6 issues there. 6 MR. LINK: Can I have one moment to confer? 7 Thank you, Judge. 7 THE COURT: Yes. 8 THE COURT: Mr. Pugatch. 8 MR. PUGATCH: The last point, Judge, would 9 MR. PUGATCH: Your Honor, if I may on behalf 9 be if your determination today is that it's going to

RSON, Esquire On behalf of Farmer Jaffe SCOTT LINK, Esquire and RICE PUGATCH ROBINSON STORFER & COHEN, by CHAD P. PUGATCH, Esquire On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein CARLTON FIELDS, BY NIALL McLAUCHLAN, Esquire JOSEPH IANNO, Esquire On behalf of Fowler White AKERMAN, LLP, by JOAN LEVIT, Esquire On behalf of

hree putative intervenors. For that reason I think the motion should be denied as to E.W. and Jane Doe. MR. PUGATCH: Your Honor, on behalf of Mr. Epstein, we would join in that objection, that limited OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, INC. EFTA00787723 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

COHEN, by CHAD P. PUGATCH, Esquire On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein CARLTON FIELDS, BY NIALL McLAUCHLAN, Es

Jane Doe. MR. PUGATCH: Your Honor, on behalf of Mr. Epstein, we would join in that objection, that limited O

just be denied, and we can go back to the circuit court and the judge can deal with the privilege issues there. Thank you, Judge. THE COURT: Mr. Pugatch. MR. PUGATCH: Your Honor, if I may on behalf of Mr. Epstein, we kind of went in reverse order, because Mr. Link got up to address the factual issu

radley J. Edwards LINK & ROCKENBACH, by SCOTT LINK, Esquire and RICE PUGATCH ROBINSON STORFER & COHEN, by CHAD P. PUGATCH, Esquire On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein CARLTON FIELDS, BY NIALL McLACHLAN, Esquire On behalf of Fowler White Barnett, P.A. PAUL G. CASSELL, Esquire (via telephone) On behalf of L.M.,

Mr. Edwards time to file a response. He filed that response at 6437, and Fowler White filed a reply at 6443. We also have a couple motions by Mr. Epstein, but the other motion of Fowler White, apart from the ones of Mr. Epstein, that Fowler White joined, is Fowler White's motion for order bifurcating

COHEN, by CHAD P. PUGATCH, Esquire On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein CARLTON FIELDS, BY NIALL McLACHLAN, Esq

reply at 6443. We also have a couple motions by Mr. Epstein, but the other motion of Fowler White, apart fro

58-8875 EFTA00788043 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 10 THE COURT: All right. Mr. Pugatch, I didn't mean to cut you off. MR. PUGATCH: That's okay, Judge. THE COURT: I wanted to make the record clear. MR. PUGATCH: I absolutely wanted i

09-34791-RBR AGREED MEDIATION CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the agreement of (1) Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), (2) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), (3) Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White") and its insurer, (4) Intervenors Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. (collectively, "Intervenors"),

ED MEDIATION CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the agreement of (1) Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), (2) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), (3) Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White") and its insurer, (4) Intervenors Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. (collectively, "Intervenors"), and (5)

ement of (1) Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), (2) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), (3) Fowler White Burnett, P.

Court. 4 EFTA00795918 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6441 Filed 09/04/18 Page 5 of 5 The Clerk shall provide copies to: Chad Pugatch, Esq. [Attorney Pugatch is directed to serve a conformed copy of this Order on all interested parties immediately upon receipt hereof and to file a certificate of service.]

"Motion"), Response [D.E. 6397], and Joinder [D.E. 6408] thereto. On April 20, 2018, the Court entered the Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not be Held in Contempt of Court [D.E. 6366] (the "Order to Show Cause"), which directed Farmer Jaffe, Mr. Bradley Edwards, L.M., E.W., and

Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not be Held in Contempt of Court [D.E. 63

ered the Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not be Held in Contempt of Court

Order to amend the List of Requested Relief Sought in this Case [D.E. 6384]. NW The Clerks shall provide copies to: Chad Pugatch. Esq. [Attorney Pugatch is directed to serve a conformed copy of this Order on all interested parties immediately upon receipt hereof and to file a certificate of service.]