Epstein Secrets

t within his law firm and his client, that being Mr. Epstein. When further asked by the court, has Mr. Epstein

-RBR Doc 6482 Filed 10/19/18 Page 4 of 97 COURT: I disagree with you. .... Take that up in your state court litigation. (Apr. Tr. 43:19-45:6.) B. Epstein has Provided Sworn Testimony and His Attendance at the Show Cause Hearing is Not Necessary. The Court allowed Movants to take Epstein's deposition

bove cause, testified on his oath as follows: THE WITNESS: Yes. DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. SCAROLA: Q Would you please state your full name? A Jeffrey E. Epstein. Q Would you list for us, please, each of your residence addresses? MR. GOLDBERGER: I think it's beyond the scope. I'm going to object to Fifth

ief Expedited Hearing Requested on or before October 24, 2018, so that the Court may rule prior to the October 26, 2018, hearing) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") moves the Court, on an expedited basis, to be excused from attending the October 26, 2018, show cause hearing, and states: INTRODUCTION On April

n the United States Virgin Islands, August /‘(2018. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. APPROV FORM: RNEY REY EPSTEIN EFTA00793497

A: Q Would you please state your full name? A Jeffrey E. Epstein. Q Would you list for us, please, each

A: Q Would you please state your full name? A Jeffrey E. Epstein. Q Would you list for us, please, each

nner a e, ersstng, cards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the Utah University of Doe Peter E. Shapiro Shapiro Law uite 3000 ounse or ., . . an ane Doe Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Niall T. McLachlan Carlton Fields Jorden Burt P.A. 200 °rinse or ow er

to anyone else. The Agreed Order Cancelling Hearing provides, in its entirety: The Motion for Relief From Amended Order (D.E. #1068) and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of All Documents in Response to his Requests filed by Interested Party Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman,

ions" (id. at p. 17) or a finding of criminal contempt "as may be appropriate" and monetary sanctions of $25,000 for each of the intervenors against Epstein for any noncompliance with the order at issue, for which amounts "Epstein [be] permitted to seek reimbursement from any of his attorneys who may ha

E OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY FOWLER WHITE AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT,

in its files, having provided all hard files to Mr. Epstein's current counsel, Scott Link. Movants' Motions

dley J. Edwards Brittany N. Henderson Edwards Pottin er LLC Counsel for Fanner Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L Peter E. Shapiro Shapiro Law Counsel for LM., E.W. and Jane Doe Isaac M. Marcushamer Berger Sin erman LLP /s/ Niall T. McLachlan Niall T. McLachlan, Esq. 114428178.1 17 E

issing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman, Bradley J. Edwards and Intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, voluntarily dismiss their Motions for Contempt against Jeffrey Epstein with prejudice and all causes of action which have or could have been asserted in this action and all claims for all forms of damages, including co

compensatory damages, sanctions, punitive damages, prejudgment interest, costs and attorneys' fees. Farmer Jaffe, Edwards, L.M., E.W., Jane Doe and Epstein will each bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. Dated: , 2018. Respectfully submitted, EDWARDS POTTINGER LLC Bradley J. Edwards FLBN Britt

arily dismiss their Motions for Contempt against Jeffrey Epstein with prejudice and all causes of action

el for Farmer Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell Peter E. Shapiro S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Shapiro Law Utah 332 S. University St. 8551 West Sunrise Boulevard, Suite 3000 Plantation, FL 33322 12-0730 Counsel for L.M., E. W. and Jane Doe Counsel f

ICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, M., Debtor. CASE NO. 09-34791-RBR CHAPTER 11 JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO THE INTERVENORS' RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO TAKE THE INTERVENORS' DEPOSITIONS AND TO COMPEL THEIR MENTAL EXAMINATIONS Jeffrey Epstei

rts.gov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, M., Debtor. CASE NO. 09-34791-RBR CHAPTER 11 JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO THE INTERVENORS' RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO TAKE THE INTERVENORS' DEPOSITIONS AND TO COMPEL THEIR MENTAL EXAMINATIONS Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") replies to the Intervenors, IM

M., Debtor. CASE NO. 09-34791-RBR CHAPTER 11 JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO THE INTERVENORS' RESPONSE TO E

Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 casse11p08aw.utah.edu Peter E. Shapiro Shapiro Law 8551 West Sunrise Boulevard, Suite 3000 Plantation, FL 33322 Counsel for , and Jane Doe Counsel for M . , M and Jane Doe Niall T. McLachl