Epstein Secrets

5 North Dixie Highway, Courtroom 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida on Wednesday, April 20, 2011 at 8:45 a.m., the following: PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE OPPOSING COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT/COUNTER- PLAINTIFF FROM MAKING EXTRA-JUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO T

TRA-JUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO TILE MEDIA AND PRESS, WITH INCORPORATED LEGAL AUTHORITIES Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.280(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this Motion for Protective O

mentary in order to insure that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant EPSTEIN receives a fair trial. See Slide cx. rel. Miami

O. 502009CA0408003OOC3CMBAG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indivi

ant to obtain additional details on the scope of Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of children — when, where,

n and is involved in a civil suit with a lawyer." [Exhibit I]. The source for much of that Article's information is Jack Scarola, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards. 2. In fact, Mr. Scarola is quoted to have said the following: EFTA00599554 CASE NO, 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMI1 AC; a. "We

idually, and individually, Defendants. Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE OPPOSING COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF FROM MAKING EXTRA-JUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO T

XTRA-JUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO THE MEDIA AND PRESS, WITH INCORPORATED LEGAL AUTHORITIES Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.280(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this Motion for Protective O

mentary in order to insure that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant EPSTEIN receives a fair trial. See State ex. rd. Miami H

CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

ant to obtain additional details on the scope of Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of children — when, where,

n and is involved in a civil suit with a lawyer." [Exhibit 1]. The source for much of that Article's information is Jack Scarola, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards. 2. In fact, Mr. Scarola is quoted to have said the following: EFTA00616236 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG a. "We w

OTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. / DRAFT 4/26/11 PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE OPPOSING COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF FROM MAKING EXTRAJUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMEN

EXTRAJUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO THE MEDIA AND PRESS, WITH INCORPORATED LEGAL AUTHORITIES Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.280(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this Amended Motion for a Pr

CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1

n the justified prosecution of his claims against Mr. Epstein"; and 2) "This constitutes a very substantial cl

ber 15, 2010, entitled "Claim: Epstein Filed Lawsuit to `Intimidate' Attorney Edwards Prosecuting Sex Abuse Cases," Jack Scarola, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, was quoted as stating: I) "The sole motivation for these claims against Mr. Edwards is an attempt to intimidate him so as to a

SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, ead-laiadividually3 Defendants. DRAFT 4/26/11 PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE OPPOSING COUNSEL AND DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF FROM MAKING EXTRAJUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMEN

EXTRAJUDICIAL STATEMENTS AND COMMENTARY TO THE MEDIA AND PRESS, WITH INCORPORATED LEGAL AUTHORITIES Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.280(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, files this Amended Motion for a Pr

CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1

n the justified prosecution of his claims against Mr. Epstein"; and 2) "This constitutes a very substantial cl

ber 15, 2010, entitled "Claim: Epstein Filed Lawsuit to `Intimidate' Attorney Edwards Prosecuting Sex Abuse Cases," Jack Scarola, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, was quoted as stating: I) "The sole motivation for these claims against Mr. Edwards is an attempt to intimidate him so as to a

correct? 4 A. To the best of my recollection today. 5 Q. When I describe both the Jane Doe versus 6 Jeffrey Epstein case and the III. versus Jeffrey Epstein case being on Qtask, I don't necessarily 8 mean just the pleadings. I mean any aspect of it, 9 not necessarily the pleadings or the fact that the

4 MR. DERSHOWITZ: Alan Dershowitz on behalf 5 of the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, of counsel. 6 MR. SCAROLA: The record should reflect that Mr. Epstein is also personally present. 8 My name is Jack Scarola. X am counsel on ° behalf of the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Brad 10 Edwards. 11 There

has that capability. I think the 3 answer is yes. 4 Q. Now, with regard to the three cases that 5 you -- well, with regard to Jane Doe versus Jeffrey 6 Epstein, I think you already told me you don't 7 recall whether you put that in Qtask; is that 8 correct? 9 A. I didn't tell you that. 10

6 MR. SCAROLA: The record should reflect that Mr. Epstein is also personally present. 8 My name is Jack S

. 6 MR. SCAROLA: The record should reflect that Mr. Epstein is also personally present. 8 My name is Jack Scarola. X am counsel on ° behalf of the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Brad 10 Edwards. 11 Thereupon, 1.2 (BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE) 1.3 having been first duly sworn or affirmed, was 14 examined and testifi

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, -VS- SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs. NOTICE OF A

(561) 721-0400 Attorneys for Bradle J. Edwards By: /s/ Andrew A. Harris ANDREW A. HARRIS Florida Bar No. 10061 2 EFTA00597552 SERVICE LIST Epstein v. Rothstein/Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB W. Chester Brewer, Jr., Esq. W. CHESTER BREWER, JR., ■. 250 S. Australian Ave., Ste. 1400 Wes

COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, -VS- SCOT

SIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESSES ANDREW A. HARRIS, ESQ., of the law firm of BURLINGTON & ROCKENBACH, P.A., files this Notice of Appearance on behalf of the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, solely as appellate counsel in this cause, and directs all parties to forward copies of all pleadings to the undersigned. Add

25/2017 01:11:08 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, -VS- SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. NOTICE OF

Avenue FL 33401 Attorneys for Bradle J. Edwards By:/s/ Nichole J. Segal NICHOLE J. SEGAL Florida Bar No. /kbt 2 EFTA00806660 SERVICE LIST Epstein v. Rothstein/Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB W. Chester Brewer, Jr., Esq. W. CHESTER BREWER, JR., P.A. 250 S. Australian Ave., Ste. 1400 W

COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, -VS- SCOT

SIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESSES NICHOLE J. SEGAL, ESQ., of the law firm of BURLINGTON & ROCKENBACH, P.A., files this Notice of Appearance on behalf of the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, solely as appellate counsel in this cause, and directs all parties to forward copies of all pleadings to the undersigned. Add

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 1.11.1BENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXIABAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintifffs), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant(s). PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEM

PTS TO RESOLVE: All issues and claims for damages asserted by and against the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein against and by EFTA00599839 Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Proposal for Settlement Bradley J. Edwards and all issues and claims which could be asserted between Bradley J.

UNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXIABAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintifffs), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, in

law and which the Court deems just and proper. 9. GOOD-FAITH: This Proposal is being submitted with the knowledge, understanding, and consent of the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, making this Proposal. 3 EFTA00599841 Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA04080030CJOCMBAG Proposal for Settlement I HEREBY CERTIFY that a