Epstein Secrets

y: VIA HAND DELIVERY & FED EX Joshua Sussman VP, General Counsel, Programming IAC/InterActiveCorp 555 West 18th Street New York, NY 10011 Re: Jeffrey Epstein VAWI.kirkland.can July 21, 2011 Facsimile: Dir. FaTall Dear Josh, I understand that your reporters, including and Wayne Barrett, are working

n and, among other things, have been questioning various individuals and government officials in the Virgin Islands to obtain information about Mr. Epstein and his business. Based on some of the prior coverage of Mr. Epstein in your publications, including reporting by Ms. II. I am very concerned that

p 555 West 18th Street New York, NY 10011 Re: Jeffrey Epstein VAWI.kirkland.can July 21, 2011 Facsim

n the Virgin Islands to obtain information about Mr. Epstein and his business. Based on some of the prior cove

10011 Re: Jeffrey Epstein VAWI.kirkland.can July 21, 2011 Facsimile: Dir. FaTall Dear Josh, I understand that your reporters, including and Wayne Barrett, are working on another story about Jeffrey Epstein and, among other things, have been questioning various individuals and government officials in

From: jpiothoupisSookoom= To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <jeevacation®gmail.com> Subject: Fw: Epstein Story Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:12:34 +0000 Importance: Normal I sent this earlier. This is his pri

z, We are closing on this story soon and are publishing early or mid-week next week. This is to reiterate my request for a phone interview with Mr. Epstein or an in-person meeting. I want Mr. Epstein to know everything I might get into related to him, and hope the two of us can meet, so that I can hear

From: jpiothoupisSookoom= To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <jeevacation®gmail.com> Subject: Fw: Ep

reiterate my request for a phone interview with Mr. Epstein or an in-person meeting. I want Mr. Epstein to kn

ere -sworn testimony in 1999 -claimed residency there -charities and the actual activities of FTC there I hope to hear from you and Mr. Epstein. Wayne Barrett From: Barrett, Wayne Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 5:49 PM To: lulkeiFIUSISNIMiliggitIM Subject: Epstein Story Mr. Lefkowitz: Thank you for off

t we're asking before declining. If you'd rather speak by phone, on or off record, I'm 1) The nonprosecution deal that you worked out specified that Epstein would do 30 months in jail? What's your understanding of why he did only 13 of the 18mo of his jail sentence, and why was he excused from the carryi

ing out the remainder of his sentence? Who approved the sentence reduction, at state or federal level, and why? 2) Do you have any knowledge of how Jeffrey Epstein was able to preserve personal and corporate tax benefits/exemption in the Virgin Islands, in 2009, which requires residency (183 days) that Epstein

el, and why? 2) Do you have any knowledge of how Jeffrey Epstein was able to preserve personal and corpora

[email protected]) Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 4:58 PM To: Subject: Hi 1Phrlititheltt This is Jacob Albert, research assistant for Wayne Barrett, at Newsweek. I know you've said that you wouldn't comment on our questions, but I wanted to give you the chance to hear what we're asking before de

t we're asking before declining. If you'd rather speak by phone, on or off record, I'm 1) The nonprosecution deal that you worked out specified that Epstein would do 30 months in jail? What's your understanding of why he did only 13 of the 18mo of his jail sentence, and why was he excused from the carryi

ing out the remainder of his sentence? Who approved the sentence reduction, at state or federal level, and why? 2) Do you have any knowledge of how Jeffrey Epstein was able to preserve personal and corporate tax benefits/exemption in the Virgin Islands, in 2009, which requires residency (183 days) that Epstein

el, and why? 2) Do you have any knowledge of how Jeffrey Epstein was able to preserve personal and corpora

ce sees fit. ----Original Message--- From: Barrett, Wayne imailto:[email protected]) This is Jacob Albert, research assistant for Wayne Barrett, at Newsweek. I know you've said that you wouldn't comment on our questions, but I wanted to give you the chance to hear what we're asking before de

el, and why? 2) Do you have any knowledge of how Jeffrey Epstein was able to preserve personal and corpora

e're asking before declining. If you'd rather speak by phone, on or off record, I'm MI 1) The nonprosecution deal that you worked out specified that Epstein would do 30 months in jail? What's your understanding of why he did only 13 of the 18mo of his jail sentence, and why was he excused from the carryi

ing out the remainder of his sentence? Who approved the sentence reduction, at state or federal level, and why? 2) Do you have any knowledge of how Jeffrey Epstein was able to preserve personal and corporate tax benefits/exemption in the Virgin Islands, in 2009, which requires residency (183 days) that Epstein

From: "Barrett, Wayne" To: Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:58:08 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi This is Jacob Albert, research assistant for Wayne Barrett, at Newsweek. I know you've said that you wouldn't comment on our questions, but I wanted to give you the chance to hear what we're asking before de

what we're asking before declining. If you'd rather speak by phone, on or off record, 1) The nonprosecution deal that you worked out specified that Epstein would do 30 months in jail? What's your understanding of why he did only 13 of the 18mo of his jail sentence, and why was he excused from the carryi

ing out the remainder of his sentence? Who approved the sentence reduction, at state or federal level, and why? 2) Do you have any knowledge of how Jeffrey Epstein was able to preserve personal and corporate tax benefits/exemption in the Virgin Islands, in 2009, which requires residency (183 days) that Epstein

el, and why? 2) Do you have any knowledge of how Jeffrey Epstein was able to preserve personal and corpora

ayne" <Wayne.Barrett®newsweekdailybeast.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:58:20 +0000 Importance: Normal This is Jacob Albert, research assistant for Wayne Barrett, at Newsweek. I know you've said that you wouldn't comment on our questions, but I wanted to give you the chance to hear what we're asking before de

From: Cecile de Jongh To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Re: Re: Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:24:11 +0000 Wayne Barrett (sp?) of Newsweek doing a story on your business

From: Cecile de Jongh To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Re: Re: Da

From: Cecile de Jongh To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Re:

From: Cecile de Jongh To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Re: Re: Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:24:11 +0000 Wayne Barrett (sp?) of Newsweek doing a story on your business life specifically for 2009/10. Wants to know tax breaks and who works for you. With warm regards,

Aug 30, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Barrett, Wayne Mrs. De Jongh, We are working on a story about business and politics in the Virgin Islands with a focus on Jeffrey Epstein. As the wife of the governor and the manager of Financial Trust Company, you were named several times in our story. We would like to give you an op

cs in the Virgin Islands with a focus on Jeffrey Epstein. As the wife of the governor and the manager of F

d politics in the Virgin Islands with a focus on Jeffrey Epstein. As the wife of the governor and the mana

k to you but were addressing the questions to him for his and your consideration. He never got back to us so I find your email to be disingenuous. Wayne Barrett Newsweek/The Daily Beast From: Financial Trust Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:19 PM To: Barrett, Wayne Subject: Re: Interview Request Le

From: Michael Wolff Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 5:48 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Good news is that nobody takes Wayne Barrett seriously. I would certainly suggest not cooperating with him in any way. Worst that wi

: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 5:48 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Good news is that nobody takes Wa

ff Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 5:48 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Good news is that nobody

From: Michael Wolff Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 5:48 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Good news is that nobody takes Wayne Barrett seriously. I would certainly suggest not cooperating with him in any way. Worst that will happen is that he rehashes old stuff--exactly why we have

From: Michael Wolff mirhaol irnrato rnm-, Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 5:48 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Good news is that nobody takes Wayne Barrett seriously. I would certainly suggest not cooperating with him in any way. Worst that wi

: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 5:48 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Good news is that nobody takes Wa

-, Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 5:48 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Good news is that nobody

: Michael Wolff mirhaol irnrato rnm-, Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 5:48 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Good news is that nobody takes Wayne Barrett seriously. I would certainly suggest not cooperating with him in any way. Worst that will happen is that he rehashes old stuff--exactly why we have