3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
11 / 3
Mentions
r-Defendant, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter- Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigne
TIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to §768.79 of the Florida Statutes, §57.041 of the Florida Statutes, §57.105 of the Florida
anted summary judgment in favor of Counter-Defendant Epstein, rendering Epstein the prevailing party and mandating an award of costs in his favor. D. Epstein is Entitled to Costs and Fees Pursuant to §57.105 of the Florida Statutes On , Epstein served upon Edwards a letter and Motion pursuant to §57.105
urt granted summary judgment in favor of Counter-Defendant Epstein, rendering Epstein the prevailing party and manda
H COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, VS. SCOT
...an offer of judgment, and (2) that party has recovered a judgment ...less than the ... offer." Levine v. Harris, 791 So. 2d 1175, 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(citing Schmidt v. Fortner, 629 So. 2d 1036,1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Likewise, pursuant to this statute, "once an offer of judgment has been made and rejec
r-Defendant, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter- Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersign
TIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to §768.79 of the Florida Statutes and Rule 1.442 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, h
COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. SCOT
...an offer of judgment, and (2) that party has recovered a judgment ...less than the ... offer.' Levine v. Harris, 791 So. 2d 1175, 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(citing Schmidt v. Fortner, 629 So. 2d 1036,1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Likewise, pursuant to this statute, "once an offer of judgment has been made and reje
r-Defendant, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter- Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersign
TIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to §768.79 of the Florida Statutes and Rule 1.442 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, h
COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. SCOT
...an offer of judgment, and (2) that party has recovered a judgment ...less than the ... offer!" Levine v. Harris, 791 So. 2d 1175, 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(citing Schmidt v. Fortner, 629 So. 2d 1036,1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Likewise, pursuant to this statute, "once an offer of judgment has been made and rejec
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and DCA 2001)(citing

George W. Bush
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSONJack Scarola
PERSONTonja Haddad Coleman
PERSONAtterbury
ORGANIZATION
Eric Schmidt
PERSON
Foreman
PERSONSearcy Denney Scarola
PERSONWolfe
PERSONMarc Nurik
PERSONMathis
PERSONFlorida, Inc.
ORGANIZATIONMcMahan
PERSONFortner
PERSONNeptune Beach
LOCATIONLevine v. Harris
PERSONMcCaw Cellular Communications
ORGANIZATIONLauderdale Sand & Fill.
ORGANIZATION