Epstein Secrets

ter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, INDIVIDUALLY Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, hereby propo

sal for Settlement and Offer of Judgment ("Proposal") a. Parties: The party making this Proposal is Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"). The party to whom this Proposal is being made is Defendant/Counter- Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, individually ("Edwards"). In this Proposal, Eps

ela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Primary: Primary: Secondary: Secondary: Secondary: Secondary: Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jay Epstein SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Nichole J. Segal Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, . Burlington & Rockenbach, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Bouleva

OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT

Jeffrey Epstein, and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, individually. The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation, hereby ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that each and every issue, claim, counterclaim, and cause of action asserted in this case by Epstein and Edwards against each other, including all c

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. AGREED MEDI

ED MEDIATION CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the agreement of (1) Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), (2) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), (3) Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White") and its insurer, (4) Intervenors Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. (collectively, "Intervenors"), and (5)

any party to a court of competent jurisdiction, be subject to remedies, including: (a) Equitable relief. (b) Compensatory damages. EFTA00805342 Jay Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards 15th Judicial Circuit Case No. 2009CA040800XXXXMBAG Agreed Mediation Confidentiality Order Page 4 (c) A

OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT

y, the "Mediation Participants"), to participate in mediation subject to this Agreed Mediation Confidentiality Order. The Court, hereby ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows: 1. Non-parties Fowler White and Farmer Jaffe consent to the jurisdiction of this Court solely for purposes of participating in the med

er-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. INDIVIDUALLY Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, hereby propo

sal for Settlement and Offer of Judgment ("Proposal") a. Parties: The party making this Proposal is Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"). The party to whom this Proposal is being made is Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, individually ("Edwards"). In this Proposal, E

CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG Plain

L 33301 Primary: Secondary: Co-counsel for Jef•ey Epstein Jack A. Goldberger Atterbuiy, Goldberger & Weis

Jeffrey Epstein, and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, individually. The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation, hereby ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that each and every issue, claim, counterclaim, and cause of action asserted in this case by Epstein and Edwards against each other, including all c

09-34791-RBR AGREED MEDIATION CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the agreement of (1) Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), (2) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), (3) Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White") and its insurer, (4) Intervenors Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. (collectively, "Intervenors"),

ED MEDIATION CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the agreement of (1) Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), (2) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), (3) Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White") and its insurer, (4) Intervenors Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. (collectively, "Intervenors"), and (5)

ement of (1) Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), (2) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), (3) Fowler White Burnett, P.

y, the "Mediation Participants"), to participate in mediation subject to this Agreed Mediation Confidentiality Order. The Court, hereby ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows: I. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.720, Edwards, Epstein, and representatives from Fowler White and Farmer Jaffe who hav

er-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. INDIVIDUALLY Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, hereby propo

sal for Settlement and Offer of Judgment ("Proposal") a. Parties: The party making this Proposal is Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"). The party to whom this Proposal is being made is Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, individually ("Edwards"). In this Proposal, E

CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG Plain

Jeffrey Epstein, and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, individually. The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation, hereby ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that each and every issue, claim, counterclaim, and cause of action asserted in this case by Epstein and Edwards against each other, including all c

S, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. ORDER ON BRIEFING FOR IN CAMERA INSPECTION THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's ("Epstein") request for an in camera inspection of 47 e-mails that Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") claims are privileged. The Cour

endants/Counter-Plaintiff. ORDER ON BRIEFING FOR IN CAMERA INSPECTION THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's ("Epstein") request for an in camera inspection of 47 e-mails that Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") claims are privileged. The Court, hereby

OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT

for an in camera inspection of 47 e-mails that Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") claims are privileged. The Court, hereby ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows: I. For the sole purpose of briefing a memorandum of law for the in camera proceedings, Epstein's counsel may unseal the envelope maint

er-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. INDIVIDUALLY Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, hereby propo

sal for Settlement and Offer of Judgment ("Proposal") a. Parties: The party making this Proposal is Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"). The party to whom this Proposal is being made is Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, individually ("Edwards"). In this Proposal, E

CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG Plain

Jeffrey Epstein, and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, individually. The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation, hereby ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that each and every issue, claim, counterclaim, and cause of action asserted in this case by Epstein and Edwards against each other, including all c