Epstein Secrets

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING PROCEEDINGS DATE TAKEN: Mon

don't think this has anything whatsoever to do 23 with the matter, but I should let you know that I 24 handled the state claims that involved Mr. Epstein 25 when I was in Division B. So I have a significant www.phippsreporting.com 888 811-3408 EFTA00606512 1 amount of familiarity with the claim

6 35:1443:18,20 27:16 36:745:9,10 1:18 33:5 58:6 www.phippsreporting.com 888 811-3408 EFTA00606578 70 impeachment ... 27:5 3:24 5:11,13 Jeffrey (2) juncture (1) 7:10 influence (1) 7:21 17:20 1:4 6:11 5:24 implicitly (3) 33:1 29:21 31:5 jgoldberger@... jurisdiction (1) 27:22,24 30:2

hat I 24 handled the state claims that involved Mr. Epstein 25 when I was in Division B. So I have a signif

ikewise commented that 19 the litigation privilege would not bar a malicious 20 prosecution claim. I have cited you to the 21 decision of Judge Corrigan in North Star Capital 22 Acquisition, LLC vs. Krig, 611 F.Supp.2d 1324 23 (M.D. Fla. 2009), another decision that was 24 decided after Levin an

-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, individually, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Motion to Strike Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Fourth Amended Counterclaim and Supporting Memorandum of Law, based on the law of the case doctrine. RELEVANT PR

of Law, based on the law of the case doctrine. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In the Fourth Amended Counterclaim, Edwards raised two claims against Epstein: 1) abuse of process and 2) malicious prosecution. As to the malicious prosecution claim, Edwards alleged that the filing of the original complaint

) 27:22,24 30:21 imploded (1) 27:5 influence (1) 33:1 information (2) 8:1 13:24 3:24 5:11,13 7:21 17:20 29:21 31:5 33:12 38:9 39:20 40:9 Jeffrey (2) 1:4 6:11 jgoldberger@... 2:11 job (2) juncture (1) 5:24 jurisdiction (1) 28:17 jury (3) 19:5 inherent (1) 44:2 48:5 58:I9 61:13 17:

hat I 24 handled the state claims that involved Mr. Epstein 25 when I was in Division B. So I have a signif

ourts have likewise commented that the litigation privilege would not bar a malicious prosecution claim. I have cited you to the decision of Judge Corrigan in North Star Capital Acquisition, LLC vs. Krig, 611 F.Supp.2d 1324 (M.D. Fla. 2009), another decision that was decided after Levin and Echevarria

en's Soccer Team-Equal Pay; New York-In Vitro Babies Switched; Robocall Scam; Wimbledon-15-Year-Old's Run Comes To An End. Network TV At A Glance: Jeffrey Epstein - 10 minutes, 40 seconds California-Earthquake - 6 minutes, 10 seconds US Women's Soccer Team-Equal Pay - 5 minutes, 10 seconds D.C.-Flash Flood Eme

fter they were accused of letting [him] off the hook." US Attorney Geoffrey Berman of New York "said that the non-prosecution agreement that spared Epstein from a heavy prison sentence a decade ago is binding only on federal prosecutors in Florida, where the deal was made, not on authorities in New Yor

lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it - Jeffrey enjoys his social life." The Washington Post (7/8, Fahrenthold, Reinhard, Kindy, 14.2M) says that in 2002, "being friendly with (Epstein] was some

ty under Section 702." The report also "criticized NSA's data system security plans, which `are often inaccurate and/or incomplete." NextGov (7/8, Corrigan) reports auditors also found the agency "held onto some of that data for longer than the law permits and failed to implement protections against ins